Yep, it's still up.
Also found this:
http://aawa.co/blog/aawa-the-next-six-months/#more-1722
Go to the subheading under 'Reorganisation', and you'll find this:
AAWA recently reorganized its corporate structure. By law, we must have identifiable corporate officers, and we do.
Looks like AAWA finally realised that they must have identifiable corporate officers (not aliases), which was what me and several other posters had earlier pointed out. See what a value JWN feedback can be? Come and drink life's water-free.
LMAO! Thanks for the update, Argentinas! Remembering being called a liar/troll or just plain wrong by AAWA and their followers after looking into this with the Arizona Corporation Commission and pointing it out here. And then receiving a threat from Julia Barrick Douglas on behalf of AAWA that she could "out" me in retaliation if she wanted to (which I guess would be a lot scarier if I hadn't already been openly out for years, but still very creepy and an abuse of power). And would you lookie there. Turns out we were correct all along, and so was the ACC! Still no apology from AAWA, though! *whistles* I won't hold my breath.