OK, then. Let me try a different tack - the original question was, now correct me if I'm wrong about this, but: Why do people insist on a) spiritual explanations b) a greater purpose for the species of humanity versus the animals???
You insist that 95 percent of the human experience with the spiritual is a delusion. This does not strike you as being a bit dogmatic? I mean, I have heard the opposite argument, that ninetyfive percent of the spiritual experience that did not revolve around the Watchtower was actually the worship of demons, and even back then that struck me as a bit of a hard line to take.
You started the debate, not about whether or not the spiritual experience is real, falsifiable, or even a positive thing, but rather over the human compulsion to find a spiritual explanation for Life, the Universe, and Everything. You insisted, from the start of the debate, that all spiritual experiences are delusions, fancies, and the products of a deep and abiding human need for comfort. When your founding statement is so patently closed to discussion, then what are you really asking the question for? What were you trying to accomplish by starting this thread? If you are really so uncurious as to ignore something that is either encoded in your DNA or a product of a soul or both, then why even ask the question? What do you care what we believe as long as we sit still and pay taxes?
I would suggest that the question, with all the attendant frustration and apparent arrogance is actually a product of your own psychic hunger, the repressed desire to connect with the Unverse, God, and the rest of humanity on a level undefinable by science.
CZAR