GC: The abusers issue is of no consequence.
Unless, of course, you are that one that was raped as a child by a JW and firther victimized by the religion that defended the rapist.
GC: The Org just has to come to terms with implementing a new guidance to turn these people to the local authorities.
If the pedophilia is "of no consequence", then why would WT change its policies?
Actually, for the number of existing JWs, the number of abuse cases is really minuscule
How would you know? WT has hidden most of these cases through gag order settlements, and keeps it hushed within the Org. itself. 99% + of JWs have never heard of the Conti case or the recent case in San Diego to the tune of $13,5 million. If JWs are ignorant of the most newsworthy cases, it's reasonable to say the scope of the problem is much larger than can be imagined.
GC, why are you here? Your Governing Body explicitly orders you not to go onto "apostate" websites, yet here you are. Why do you defend your leadership when even you don't believe what they say?