foreword

Joined

• started 15 topics
• posted 526 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by foreword

• 
  73

  MAPLE LEAFS WIN STANLEY CUP!!!!!

  by iiz2cool in

  1. social
  2. physical

  can you see the headlines?

  toronto maple leafs win stanley cup!!!!!.

  yonge st. will be closed after the all night victory bash, the first such bash since 1967!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  In a sense I'm an Avs fan, but only because they moved from Quebec to Denver. When Sakic and Forsberg leave I'll choose another team, but never Montreal or Toronto. They rigged the NHL in it's early days before the draft system (by having access to juniors before other teams could), that's why they count so many Stanley cups.......I just hate it when Montreal fans brag about all their Cups, just makes me want to kick em in the nuts....LOL. Toronto, not as bad...they were never a threat after the draft started, so I just let them wallow in their pity.

  Aztec, theoretically the Avs are in first place since they are two games behind, but only two points away.....

  As far as the Red Wings go, and Toronto too I guess, here you have two teams which can't take the pressure in the playoffs, sort of like a Cub's curse. The Red wings, well I sorta pity them, they try so hard but never make it no matter what. Toronto...you'll just have to watch Sundin do absolutely nothing during the playoffs, that's why the Avs got rid of him. Very frustating player to have on your team during the playoffs, trust me.

  This year's finals.....Montreal---Colorado.
• 
  193

  US calls off search for weapons of mass destruction

  by WhyNow2000 in

  1. social
  2. current

  the bush administration has quietly withdrawn a 400-member military team.

  it sent to baghdad to scour iraq for evidence of unconventional weapons.... .

  http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2004/0109/901262949hm1iraq.html.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  The lie?

  I guess if you want to keep it down to basics, no personal opinions permitted, WMD's in Iraq is the lie, since they weren't found and you cannot substantiate your claims. In a court of law, your case would be thrown out for lack of proof. You have some circumstantial evidence but not enough to prove beyond reasonable doubt that they existed and were in Iraq at the time of your invasion.

  You can answer, "We will find Them".......but that is only an opinion, it doesn't prove they exist.

  So in essence, and from a legal standpoint, your actions are likened to filing a false report resulting in an illegal search warrant.

  Yes, so far, your president has lied.
• 
  19

  Bush, The Moon, and Mars....

  by Sentinel in

  1. social
  2. current

  it appears that bush is really pushing space exploration right now.

  he wants the moon colonized asap.

  what's the rush?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  It's all about ownership. The moon is owned by the US, since they've got a flag there. The first ones to plant their flag on Mars will own it and have the right to exploit it's resources. Other nations will have to pay rent for it's use....toll booths and rest areas come to mind, while they try to reach the moons of Jupiter to plant their own flags.

  I think it's very possible but I don't believe we should put lifes in jeopardy and rush it. Let the robots crash and burn before we send a human being.
• 
  193

  US calls off search for weapons of mass destruction

  by WhyNow2000 in

  1. social
  2. current

  the bush administration has quietly withdrawn a 400-member military team.

  it sent to baghdad to scour iraq for evidence of unconventional weapons.... .

  http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2004/0109/901262949hm1iraq.html.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  the Coalition forces uncovered more in a few days than Blix and his cronies did the whole time they were there

  I certainly hope so. You have 130,000 roaming Iraq compared to a handful for the UN, not mentioning the fact that no one is stopping you from searching or trying to divert your attention. But if you take it man for man, year for year (per man hours)...you're not doing much better in finding those weapons are you? So why accuse the UN inspectors of doing a bad job. They didn't have free access to the country as you do.

  What amazes me also, is that Powell, when facing the UN security counsel, seemed to know exactly where those weapons were. According to him, if the US was given a chance they would find those weapons in a snap. So what happened to all that intelligence? Why haven't you found them?

  Like I said, per man hours, you're lagging behind the UN in effectiveness in locating them.
• 
  193

  US calls off search for weapons of mass destruction

  by WhyNow2000 in

  1. social
  2. current

  the bush administration has quietly withdrawn a 400-member military team.

  it sent to baghdad to scour iraq for evidence of unconventional weapons.... .

  http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2004/0109/901262949hm1iraq.html.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  Of course they will find WMD in Iraq, just like they would probably find some in almost every country on the planet or find programs to develop them.

  The question is, did Saddam have enough to pose a threat to the US. That was the basis for going to war. So far the US has been unable to prove that he did have enough to pose a threat.
• 
  193

  US calls off search for weapons of mass destruction

  by WhyNow2000 in

  1. social
  2. current

  the bush administration has quietly withdrawn a 400-member military team.

  it sent to baghdad to scour iraq for evidence of unconventional weapons.... .

  http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2004/0109/901262949hm1iraq.html.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  yeru...that was not meant as an insult. You said that some here suffered from invincible ignorance, I just turned it around to show you that it's possible for me to think the same in regards to your opinions.

  stacy...why don't you go ride your supersonic bike.......or go fly a kite in Maui.
• 
  193

  US calls off search for weapons of mass destruction

  by WhyNow2000 in

  1. social
  2. current

  the bush administration has quietly withdrawn a 400-member military team.

  it sent to baghdad to scour iraq for evidence of unconventional weapons.... .

  http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/front/2004/0109/901262949hm1iraq.html.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  Yeru I agree...

  you do suffer from invincible ignorance....
• 
  26

  Any metal heads?

  by DEDMACHINE in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  just curious if there's any major metal heads here?

  what sort of bands or music are all you guys into?

  i'm a huge opeth fan, and death metal for that matter.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  All the 80's metal definitely!

  Absolutely, most of it was original, and well....heavy.

  This new stuff is just noise to me. Or maybe I'm just getting old.

  LOL.....ya, getting old might not help. Actually, the music ain't that bad, it's the singers I can't stand....what the hell are they mad about.

  A few bands I used to listen to in the eighties apart from the obvious, Anvil, Micheal Schenker Group, Pinheads, Accept. The first albums of Van Halen and Def Leppard had excellent guitar. Actually anything with good guitar will catch my ear, as long as the singer makes sense.
• 
  23

  God Told Him It's Bush In A Blowout!......Per Pat Robertson

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i thought you should know the good news.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  I wonder if god talked to him before or after Bush gave him a sizeable donation?

  Or maybe the wires got crossed and Bin Laden was supposed to get that message.
• 
  183

  BUSH MOST ADMIRED MAN IN THE US

  by Yerusalyim in

  1. social
  2. current

  hmmm, interesting.

  bush is the most admired man in the us with 29% saying he's tops.. http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/7595879.htmposted on tue, dec. 30, 2003bush, sen. clinton most admired.

  washington george w. bush and hillary rodham clinton are finally on the same ticket the most admired man and woman in america, according to a poll released monday.. the republican president and the democratic senator from new york and former first lady wont be found on the same sides of many political issues.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  foreword

  So then it all depends on who the bad guy is.

  This is the way I see it. The US invades Iraq primarily cause it's oil supply is in jeopardy, and it's of national interest to secure some oil since the economy could falter. This was made easy for the US since Saddam was a bad guy. However, because of your motives, I'm not sure how to classify you guys, good or bad.

  Of course you don't want anyone to accuse you of doing it for oil, it would almost equate you guys acting like hitler. But to me, it's still what you did, I don't buy your humanitarian twist to justify it.