Burn,
How can you say the use of "full-color pictures, nice layout, lots of quotes and citations" is "dangerous" when your unnecessarily long dialogue between Dan and Mike is filled with illustrations and comparisons, some of which present a distorted view?
What I think is distorted are some of the denials you use. For example, there are three-headed gods among the ancient pagans, and non-trinitarians compare those three-headed gods with the Catholic and Protestant Trinity. But if, as you say, the God of the Bible is a Trinity, why in the Bible are there no hints of him having three heads? God is always spoken of as "He," never as "They".
The dialogue admits that church and pagan gods with three heads are similar, but you say the pagans were portraying three gods whereas the churches have only one God in mind. Then why does church artwork use such pagan representations? Why deny that the teaching is confusing, unreasonable and unscriptural? If Trinitarians worship only one God, why do they use illustrations that pagans employ to portray three gods? It would seem that Trinitarians bow before three gods, after all, and not the God who was worshipped as the one true God by the Jews. At John 4:22, Jesus said regarding himself and the Jews of his day, "You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews." Jesus our Savior worshiped, not a Trinity, but the same unitary God that all other godly Jews worshiped. (John 20:17)
To illustrate that three can mean "one," you refer to a family where several persons compose "one" family. In other words, your Trinitarian god is a committee of three persons. But the Bible doesn't teach that God is a family or a committee. Rather it says that he is alone, by himself, that there is none else, that he is one, that there is none beside Him, etc. (Isaiah 43:10, 11; 44:8, 24; 45:5, 6, 21, 22; 46:9) Many times in the Bible He is called the Holy One, but He is never called the Holy Three. (Isaiah 41:14; 49:7)
fjtoth