it looks inevitable.
do you think this is more a carry over from president pappy bush's not getting the job done while he was in office?
do you think the usa and it's allies can fight multiple wars??
dubla
i'm not in favour of any military action.
"the taliban helped train and financially supported the terrorists invovled in 9/11."
please prove to me that terrorists were on board those planes. the list the FBI published of names and faces, was a joke. some of them turned up alive and well in other countries. if you think the 9/11 story as published the US administration is the 'truth'....then great, i have no problem with that.
with the increase in international terrorism, do you think it's likely that bush could be assassinated?
how would the american people that arent behind bush and the looming war in iraq at the moment react if it did happen?
do you think it would lead to more bills like 'homeland security' that restrict the american peoples freedom?
interesting thought simon! :-)
it looks inevitable.
do you think this is more a carry over from president pappy bush's not getting the job done while he was in office?
do you think the usa and it's allies can fight multiple wars??
it would have been better not to have created them in the first place.
having said that unfortunately there's only one way to beat a terrorist, and thats to play them at their own game, not through war, but by assassination. thats the only way to beat them. thats how spain beat ETA in the late 70's early 80's.
as for the taliban? what difference is there between them, north korea, burma, robert mugabe, and such like? well one difference is that afghanistan is a major route for an oil supply pipeine from the caspian region to pakistan, which Unocal are now building.
with the increase in international terrorism, do you think it's likely that bush could be assassinated?
how would the american people that arent behind bush and the looming war in iraq at the moment react if it did happen?
do you think it would lead to more bills like 'homeland security' that restrict the american peoples freedom?
with the increase in international terrorism, do you think it's likely that Bush could be assassinated? how would the american people that arent behind Bush and the looming war in iraq at the moment react if it did happen? do you think it would lead to more bills like 'homeland security' that restrict the american peoples freedom? i'm sure something like that would make the US more belligerent.
Edited by - pleasuredome on 24 January 2003 11:24:4
it looks inevitable.
do you think this is more a carry over from president pappy bush's not getting the job done while he was in office?
do you think the usa and it's allies can fight multiple wars??
i dont support any war. i dont think this war is a 'carry over' from the last war. this war is about securing iraqi oil fields and removing saddam and putting into place a 'puppet' like in afghanistan, and you can be sure that like hamed kharzi the new iraqi leader will have oil company connections.
i think the US can fight multi wars, but as for its allies, not really. if a war developes in the asia-pacific, mabe the royal navy could withdraw from the gulf and go there, but i doubt the US would get much support unless nato was mobilized.
what were some of your fave acade games of the 80's?
mine were....paper boy .
pacman .
what were some of your fave acade games of the 80's?
mine were....paper boy .
pacman .
a bbc correspondent documentary aired on june 23, 2002, exposed how the iraqi regime staged these processions: instead of burying dead children immediately in accordance with muslim custom, iraqi authorities hold the bodies in cold storage until enough bodies are available to conduct a "parade of dead babies.
"15 in one such event, the iraqi regime exhibited some 60 coffins, decorated with large photographs of the deceased, around martyr square in baghdad while government-controlled demonstrators chanted anti-u.s. slogans and demanded the elimination of un sanctions, all for the benefit of foreign reporters who were present.
on camera, an iraqi identified as ali, described as a former member of saddam's inner circle living in northern iraq, related the account of a taxi driver who had explained to him how it worked: "he went to najaf [a town 100 miles south of baghdad] a couple of days ago.
perry
its very simple if you keep abreast of world politic. tony blair is trying his level best to convince the british public that action is needed against iraq. he needs to justify support for the US for the military build up and threats, and sending british military to the gulf too. because he has nothing to go, in th past couple of days he's trying to link iraq with al qaeda as a scaremongering tactic to make think 'Yer, saddam does pose a threat to us', especially since the ricin arrests made in london and manchester.
also a mosque was raided in london where radical cleric Abu Hamza is based who has been suspected of links to al qaeda for a number of years. police had monitered thousands of coded messages going to and from this mosque to suspected terrorists groups.
other than that, just the fact that iraq isnt a present danger anymore than its been for the past 20 years.
a bbc correspondent documentary aired on june 23, 2002, exposed how the iraqi regime staged these processions: instead of burying dead children immediately in accordance with muslim custom, iraqi authorities hold the bodies in cold storage until enough bodies are available to conduct a "parade of dead babies.
"15 in one such event, the iraqi regime exhibited some 60 coffins, decorated with large photographs of the deceased, around martyr square in baghdad while government-controlled demonstrators chanted anti-u.s. slogans and demanded the elimination of un sanctions, all for the benefit of foreign reporters who were present.
on camera, an iraqi identified as ali, described as a former member of saddam's inner circle living in northern iraq, related the account of a taxi driver who had explained to him how it worked: "he went to najaf [a town 100 miles south of baghdad] a couple of days ago.
No Link Between Iraq
and Al-Qaeda Says UN
But he said he was unaware of any evidence that "directly links" al-Qaeda, Iraq and "terrorist activities" in Britainanybody believe these 2 statements aren't bullshit? did anyone ask mr Blair about Bush's connections with Bin Laden and his banker and funder, Khalid Bin Mahfouz? |
a bbc correspondent documentary aired on june 23, 2002, exposed how the iraqi regime staged these processions: instead of burying dead children immediately in accordance with muslim custom, iraqi authorities hold the bodies in cold storage until enough bodies are available to conduct a "parade of dead babies.
"15 in one such event, the iraqi regime exhibited some 60 coffins, decorated with large photographs of the deceased, around martyr square in baghdad while government-controlled demonstrators chanted anti-u.s. slogans and demanded the elimination of un sanctions, all for the benefit of foreign reporters who were present.
on camera, an iraqi identified as ali, described as a former member of saddam's inner circle living in northern iraq, related the account of a taxi driver who had explained to him how it worked: "he went to najaf [a town 100 miles south of baghdad] a couple of days ago.
Dear Minority President Bush:
As you go about your business today please remember that in the presidential election, 539,987 more U.S. citizens preferred another man be president.
with love from the UK
how cool was barbarian?
