em1913

Joined

• started 1 topics
• posted 86 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by em1913

• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  As for catcalls, it isn't even a sexual thing. It's a put-the-woman-in-her-place thing.

  I'm not a young woman. At all. I'm overweight, I've got greying hair, I'm broad in the beam and sagging in the ankles. And yet, I can be out front of my workplace doing something on the sidewalk, and a carful of young jackasses can pull up and yell a lewd suggestion. That's not because I'm hawwwwt baby, it's because these little turds think they're putting me in my place, whatever that might be.
  

  And then I turn around and yell "go suck your mother's tit" and they get disabused of that idea real quick. My aunt taught me well.
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  When you've read and digested "Brain Storm," we'll talk.
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  Well, you'll have something to do in the morning then. The UK is awful in January, a library's very pleasant place to be.

  I tend, to be honest, to be skeptical of the kind of scientific papers that get a lot of play in the news, whether I agree with their conclusions or not. Too often you'll see something presented as BOLD NEW REVELATION STARTLING DISCOVERY ANNOUNCED BY PROFS when in reality, if you actually read the paper, it suggests that a certain thing appears to be true due to certain results but further study is warranted. Many scientists in the public eye are guilty of going along with this kind of media coverage because, you know, publish or perish -- but those You Tube clicks are really where it's at. And yes, a great deal of science is bought and paid for -- the tobacco and petroleum industries, in particular, have long had dirty hands in this regard, and I question anything that comes out of a "think tank."
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  You seem to think you're in the position to dictate the terms of the conversation here. You're not.

  I've invited you to do the research, and I've shown you where to do it, and I've given you a nugget to start from. You're free to accept or reject that challenge if you want, but your rejection of that suggestion doesn't obligate me in any way to do the research for you. If you're sincerely interested in the points I've raised, you'll do the reading for yourself and satisfy yourself in your own mind. If not, then that's your choice. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him think.

  Scientific papers don't get "debunked," by the way. They get challenged, they get questioned, they may be refuted or superseded or disproven by subsequent research, but "debunking" is something that only happens in the popular press and on the Internet -- and it usually happens to something that never should have been "bunked" in the first place.

  Congratulations on your graduation -- but remember, every day you live is part of your continuing education.
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  Not at all odd. You're in "uni." You're a student. I've invited you to do your own research on a point. Do it. Research you do yourself will be much more convincing to you than anything some anonymous set of initials on the internet can provide.
  

  But here's a starting point for you: in scientific research, what would you call a scientist whose preferred methodology is the use of data gathered through a process of self-selection? Would you consider it reliable? Or would you weigh self-selection bias in your conclusions? If not, justify your position.
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  You've got a library card, son. Use it.
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  Read her book, and then we'll talk. You'll see the foundations of B-C's research methodology across various studies laid out in detail. If he's improved his methodologies and been more rigorous with his conclusions since then, good for him. But if you're unwilling to consider the possiblity that he may be, shall we say, overstating the facts or allowing the facts to be overstated on his behalf in order to sell his own book, then you better work on your own academic rigor.
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  She's published by Harvard University Press, kids. That's what I was referring to. Pretty much top of the academic publishing heap here in the US. (BTW, Barnard is one of the "Seven Sisters," the seven most prestigious women's colleges in the US.) And yes, she does have a background in cognitive neuroscience. You can be a professor of (gad) Women's Studies and still have legitimate scientific credentials in other disciplines. That's how academia works. Her CV is here -- https://barnard.edu/profiles/rebecca-jordan-young

  And the book in question is here: http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674063518&content=reviews. I know, I know, Publisher's Weekly is such a man-hating feminist rag.
  

  Dueling academics is such a classic internet-forum game to play.
  
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  As I said, you'll have to read the book for the rest. It's all laid out in detail there. I'll see you Cambridge and raise you Harvard. (And Dr. J-Y would want me to mention her background in cognitive neurosvcience. XD right back atcha, you kids with your LOLS and your ROFLS and what not.)
  
• 
  194

  Is Being a “Manly Man” a Bad Thing?

  by minimus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so much is said regarding men , in a negative way.

  shaving commercials are now lecturing us as to how bad we really are.

  men should be less masculine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  em1913

  Another thing I find with certain types of men is that they can't tell when a tongue is in a cheek, especially when it's a woman's tongue in a woman's cheek. Funny how it is that so many men think women have no sense of humor. I'm just kind of amused by the discussion, that's all. I wasn't supposed to laugh at the elders at the KH, you know, but I always did.
  

  Jordan-Young questions quite a bit of B-C's methodology, especially his small sample sizes and also the way in which the conclusions he did reach have been taken out of context by the pop-science press and made to seem much more conclusive than they actually are. Some of his results have been, so far, irreproducible, and others have been directly contradicted by the findings of other, larger-scale studies done by researchers in San Francisco and Toronto. That's the gist, but you'll have to read the book for the rest.