M,
Part I
It shouldn't surprise me that you continue coming back with confirmationally biased bullshit. It is clear that you aren't interested in learning anything, only confirming your biases and trying to spread them for your own selfish, narcissistic, egocentric reasons. Hysterical rants and testimonials are always some of the least accurate pieces of evidence, but they work best on the uninformed and the feeler/perceivers who are led by their biases, fears, hysterias and feelings. You, in other words.
As I have stated, I attended classes and/or taught at 3 colleges and 2 universities over a decade. I was very careful to avoid imposing my social or political views when I taught, as are most professors. I recall 2 instances where the political/social views of the profs were objectionable, and both of them were Far Right profs. They felt compelled to impose their views on the class and likely the admin. Neither fared well. Having said that, my experience is relevant to a small degree. The real data is what I posted to you yesterday, but it wasn't what you wanted to hear. Now, from reputable, empirical sources:
This chart shows what I mentioned yesterday. The overall % of Marxists in academia is ridiculously low (3%) but it is highest in the social sciences. If I'm taking a project management course at the Master's level or an Finance class at the Doctorate level social views rarely if ever need to be discussed. That is the situation with the vast majority of classes. Social sciences are different in that social and political views are the topic, but they are a minority of classes. The issue as I stated is a ruse and a ploy by the Far Right because the majority of professors in all disciplines are liberal, and that is what rankles them.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2015/03/the_prevalence_1.html