Posts by DJS

24

Girls are unpredictable, materialist, and use us, men, as a toy - Part 3

by will-be-apostate in

jw
friends

a year ago i had a rough time and posted this .

it was a controversial topic, some people got offended by my overly boastful tone, others offered help.

i appreciate any kind of opinion and i try to correct the flaws in my personality.

DJS

Good morning Wake Me and Happy Almost New Year!!

I plead guilty as charged. However, you knew full well that the bait you through out in your post to Scratchme was designed to reel in guys like me (playing coy and innocent is unattractive). Or apparently on this site, guy like me. For most of my single life I have lived a bachelor's life to the full, without regrets and at no time taking advantage of XXers or manipulating them in any manner. Most of my friends are married women, and I've managed to maintain close relationships with them for 10 - 20 years because I treat them with respect. They are also gorgeous women. Their husbands trust me because I've earned it.

For the other half of my single life I have been in relationships. I am very good at commitment, and no one has ever broken up with me because I don't give them reasons to. Having said that, I love girl on girl, and it is almost a pre-requisite for a relationship. It will be moving forward.

So yes, I will take the girl on girl bait every time because I know how effing amazing it is as a lifestyle. But if we met in person, unless you looked like the photograph you posted or close to it, I wouldn't likely bother flirting because I wouldn't want to have to call - or nudge - you in the morning. I'm shallow like that.

But this is the world wide web, baby, and you flirt and I flirt and it's amazing.

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

Part II

M and CaptainGurl,

The Washington Post, which is definitely NOT a conservative right wing media, developed this story recently noting the liberal nature of today's college profs and suggesting that it could potentially impact the quality of education. Note "potentially'.

The Post's empirical source states that "the numbers suggest that professors' liberal tilt does have some impact on their students' ideology, but not much." They've started surveying graduating college seniors in recent years. While they don't have many years of data available yet, in 2009 they found that "the proportion of students who characterized their political views as liberal or far left increased 9.2 percentage points from freshman to senior year."

Three percent of professors being Marxist DOES NOT equate to colleges being full of them, but it does equate to YOU being full of IT. The Right Wing HATES that academia is overwhelmingly liberal, and like they do with every topic they hate, they lie, misrepresent and appeal to the fears and hysterias of the uninformed to try to obtain change or at least discredit the people they hate. You are the primary audience and they play you like the fools you are because they are telling you what you want to hear.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/11/the-dramatic-shift-among-college-professors-thats-hurting-students-education/

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

M,

Part I

It shouldn't surprise me that you continue coming back with confirmationally biased bullshit. It is clear that you aren't interested in learning anything, only confirming your biases and trying to spread them for your own selfish, narcissistic, egocentric reasons. Hysterical rants and testimonials are always some of the least accurate pieces of evidence, but they work best on the uninformed and the feeler/perceivers who are led by their biases, fears, hysterias and feelings. You, in other words.

As I have stated, I attended classes and/or taught at 3 colleges and 2 universities over a decade. I was very careful to avoid imposing my social or political views when I taught, as are most professors. I recall 2 instances where the political/social views of the profs were objectionable, and both of them were Far Right profs. They felt compelled to impose their views on the class and likely the admin. Neither fared well. Having said that, my experience is relevant to a small degree. The real data is what I posted to you yesterday, but it wasn't what you wanted to hear. Now, from reputable, empirical sources:

This chart shows what I mentioned yesterday. The overall % of Marxists in academia is ridiculously low (3%) but it is highest in the social sciences. If I'm taking a project management course at the Master's level or an Finance class at the Doctorate level social views rarely if ever need to be discussed. That is the situation with the vast majority of classes. Social sciences are different in that social and political views are the topic, but they are a minority of classes. The issue as I stated is a ruse and a ploy by the Far Right because the majority of professors in all disciplines are liberal, and that is what rankles them.

http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2015/03/the_prevalence_1.html

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

Ms. Roboto is the typical Conspiracy Theorist. She has a limited education, she has never accomplished anything important in life, is too lazy to obtain an education or do what is necessary to accomplish anything meaningful, and she surfs the web from her mom's basement obsessively scouring various CT and Right Wing Nut Quackery websites and then terrorizing the good people of Gotham with her shiny new toy.

She is typical that is with one exception: She lacks courage. Yes, class, Ms. Roboto won't own her CT. She's afraid we will make fun of her if she admits to being a CT. We will of course, but at least we will have some respect for her to finally OWN it. So I'm going to help her own it and to stop being a limp wrested, flaccid, impotent, CT denying coward. It's the least I can do.

Ms. Robot0: What makes a king out of a slave? Courage! What makes the flag on the mast to wave? Courage! What makes the elephant charge his tusk in the misty mist, or the dusky dusk? What makes the muskrat guard his musk? Courage! What makes the sphinx the seventh wonder? Courage! What makes the dawn come up like THUNDER?! Courage. What makes the Hottentot so hot? What puts the "ape" in ape-ricot? Whatta they got that you ain't got?

Courage.

Soooo, by the power vested in me by AWEs (get it, AWEs/OZ), I hereby bequeath to the cowardly Ms. Roboto what she clearly lacks. You dear, are now ordained as a card carrying member of Conspiracy Theorists R Us. Go forth and terrorize the natives on the world wide web.

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

I just knew Ms. Roboto and Princess Captain Gurl would finally combine their intellects. Together they reached 100 on the IQ scale. Yay!!! Such a milestone requires a commemorative photo. Smile guys. Or not.

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

CaptainGirl,

Denigrating others' bona fides is a standard MO (that's Method of Operation, Princess) employed by CTs, since they typically have NO bona fides. Thank you for verifying my assertion about you. Damn, you are easy. And I don't even have to call you in the morning (I DON'T have to call you in the morning, do I?).

Keep this up and I will have to start calling you my bitch.

24

Girls are unpredictable, materialist, and use us, men, as a toy - Part 3

by will-be-apostate in

jw
friends

a year ago i had a rough time and posted this .

it was a controversial topic, some people got offended by my overly boastful tone, others offered help.

i appreciate any kind of opinion and i try to correct the flaws in my personality.

DJS

@Wake Me:

I avoid pain killers. No pain. No gain. What doesn't kill you . . . . . And nope, it's love. True love. This time. Not that shallow, narcissistic stuff from the past ;-)))

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

Princess,

You started this when you came onto this site with your arrogance, your high school diploma, your boring lame-ass life and your slavish devotion to the Far Right web sites you adore.

Don't bring a knife to a gun fight, sweetie. If you had bona fides we would have learned about them multiple pages ago.

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

Come on Princess, let it all out.

Breitbart, Faux (Fox) News, Drudge, Savage, et all have the identical MO: They have never met a conspiracy theory they didn't love; They scour the news for ANY instance wherein:

Someone threatened their precious guns; someone threatened their precious jesus; some immigrant did something wrong; some far left college admin/prof said something leftish; due to their obsessions with all things Obama and Clinton they routinely trot out the same lame, tired, debunked stories and accounts from the recent and distant past as though they were newsworthy or valid, and some Muslim acted in any manner than might threaten them.

And they repeat it over and over and over. And you, Princess, lap it up like the trained puppy you are. Rinse and repeat.

Now, let me hear your Obama birther/Muslim/Gay/Murder stories. Let it out, Princess. You know you want to.

83

The Scientific Method

by cofty in

.

DJS

I have an MBA, working on a PhD, have been a college prof, traveled the world and know a lot about a lot. What are your bona fides, besides trolling internet sites and being addicted to Rush Limbaugh?

And, btw, thank you so very much for verifying my assertions re: Clinton. But don't hold back, Princess, spill all of it. Let's hear your rant about Obama and the rest of the Far Right Nut Job Whackadoodle Conspiracy Theorists.

I will accept your bow as the contrition and humility we have been waiting for. And, Princess, Einstein, Planck and every other scientist who has ever lived built on the work that came before them, and they were humble enough to acknowledge such.

Other than being the Queen of Portugal, Princess, you have established no bona fides for doing anything other than trolling and parroting.

Good puppy.