Hey CG,
I believe Cofty meant this for you. Since it's the holiday season and I'm trying to be generous, I didn't want you to miss it. I'm just that kinda guy. (nice to know I'm your viagra - have I kept you 'up' all night, sweetie?). Flattered I am.
"Somebody who asserts things about reality but who has never bothered to acquaint themself with the relevant evidence - and who refuses to do so - is lazy and arrogant. That isn't an insult it's just a fact."
Happy New Year, ya adorable little CT.
Hey fummdukk,
I'm the one who told you colleges were more liberal. Why you add the term 'insanely' liberal shows you are unhinged. You know NO college profs, you have never attended college, and you can't go on any of the college campuses in your tri-state area because of the restraining orders the coeds took out against you.
But it's always nice to get validation that I have gotten under the skin of people like you and that I can control your emotions and reactions.
Good puppy. Goooooooood puppy.
Happy New Year Captaingrl.
a year ago i had a rough time and posted this .
it was a controversial topic, some people got offended by my overly boastful tone, others offered help.
i appreciate any kind of opinion and i try to correct the flaws in my personality.
@Wake Me,
You mean you have wasted, oh, about 5 minutes of my life and shared, oh, about 5 posts, and still no three way? Cruel you are. Just cruel. I don't know how I can go on. I will just have to keep telling myself that it's a target rich environment I suppose, to get over the rejection
Happy New Year's Eve!.
Captain Gurl,
As expected, I post empirical data from reputable sources that was obtained from dozens/hundreds of colleges and universities and you post a viral rant from a R wing nut job. Like all R Wing CT NutQuackeries your kryptonite is evidence of the empirical variety. As for bona fides, as I've stated many times on this site: if Simon wants to serve as the validator, I will be happy to email to his private email account any documentation you and he requires, including diplomas, names and contact information for the various colleges and universities where I attended or taught to verify. Education is the easiest thing to validate, but you wouldn't know that since you've never been on a college campus other than to harass the coeds.
OTOH, all you have to do to validate that you are a barely educated, dim-witted drone for the Far Right CT NutJob Climate Change Denying Media you adore……. is to keep posting.
Good puppy.
a year ago i had a rough time and posted this .
it was a controversial topic, some people got offended by my overly boastful tone, others offered help.
i appreciate any kind of opinion and i try to correct the flaws in my personality.
Good morning Wake Me and Happy Almost New Year!!
I plead guilty as charged. However, you knew full well that the bait you through out in your post to Scratchme was designed to reel in guys like me (playing coy and innocent is unattractive). Or apparently on this site, guy like me. For most of my single life I have lived a bachelor's life to the full, without regrets and at no time taking advantage of XXers or manipulating them in any manner. Most of my friends are married women, and I've managed to maintain close relationships with them for 10 - 20 years because I treat them with respect. They are also gorgeous women. Their husbands trust me because I've earned it.
For the other half of my single life I have been in relationships. I am very good at commitment, and no one has ever broken up with me because I don't give them reasons to. Having said that, I love girl on girl, and it is almost a pre-requisite for a relationship. It will be moving forward.
So yes, I will take the girl on girl bait every time because I know how effing amazing it is as a lifestyle. But if we met in person, unless you looked like the photograph you posted or close to it, I wouldn't likely bother flirting because I wouldn't want to have to call - or nudge - you in the morning. I'm shallow like that.
But this is the world wide web, baby, and you flirt and I flirt and it's amazing.
Part II
M and CaptainGurl,
The Washington Post, which is definitely NOT a conservative right wing media, developed this story recently noting the liberal nature of today's college profs and suggesting that it could potentially impact the quality of education. Note "potentially'.
The Post's empirical source states that "the numbers suggest that professors' liberal tilt does have some impact on their students' ideology, but not much." They've started surveying graduating college seniors in recent years. While they don't have many years of data available yet, in 2009 they found that "the proportion of students who characterized their political views as liberal or far left increased 9.2 percentage points from freshman to senior year."
Three percent of professors being Marxist DOES NOT equate to colleges being full of them, but it does equate to YOU being full of IT. The Right Wing HATES that academia is overwhelmingly liberal, and like they do with every topic they hate, they lie, misrepresent and appeal to the fears and hysterias of the uninformed to try to obtain change or at least discredit the people they hate. You are the primary audience and they play you like the fools you are because they are telling you what you want to hear.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/wonk/wp/2016/01/11/the-dramatic-shift-among-college-professors-thats-hurting-students-education/
M,
Part I
It shouldn't surprise me that you continue coming back with confirmationally biased bullshit. It is clear that you aren't interested in learning anything, only confirming your biases and trying to spread them for your own selfish, narcissistic, egocentric reasons. Hysterical rants and testimonials are always some of the least accurate pieces of evidence, but they work best on the uninformed and the feeler/perceivers who are led by their biases, fears, hysterias and feelings. You, in other words.
As I have stated, I attended classes and/or taught at 3 colleges and 2 universities over a decade. I was very careful to avoid imposing my social or political views when I taught, as are most professors. I recall 2 instances where the political/social views of the profs were objectionable, and both of them were Far Right profs. They felt compelled to impose their views on the class and likely the admin. Neither fared well. Having said that, my experience is relevant to a small degree. The real data is what I posted to you yesterday, but it wasn't what you wanted to hear. Now, from reputable, empirical sources:
This chart shows what I mentioned yesterday. The overall % of Marxists in academia is ridiculously low (3%) but it is highest in the social sciences. If I'm taking a project management course at the Master's level or an Finance class at the Doctorate level social views rarely if ever need to be discussed. That is the situation with the vast majority of classes. Social sciences are different in that social and political views are the topic, but they are a minority of classes. The issue as I stated is a ruse and a ploy by the Far Right because the majority of professors in all disciplines are liberal, and that is what rankles them.
http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2015/03/the_prevalence_1.html
Ms. Roboto is the typical Conspiracy Theorist. She has a limited education, she has never accomplished anything important in life, is too lazy to obtain an education or do what is necessary to accomplish anything meaningful, and she surfs the web from her mom's basement obsessively scouring various CT and Right Wing Nut Quackery websites and then terrorizing the good people of Gotham with her shiny new toy.
She is typical that is with one exception: She lacks courage. Yes, class, Ms. Roboto won't own her CT. She's afraid we will make fun of her if she admits to being a CT. We will of course, but at least we will have some respect for her to finally OWN it. So I'm going to help her own it and to stop being a limp wrested, flaccid, impotent, CT denying coward. It's the least I can do.
Ms. Robot0: What makes a king out of a slave? Courage! What makes the flag on the mast to wave? Courage! What makes the elephant charge his tusk in the misty mist, or the dusky dusk? What makes the muskrat guard his musk? Courage! What makes the sphinx the seventh wonder? Courage! What makes the dawn come up like THUNDER?! Courage. What makes the Hottentot so hot? What puts the "ape" in ape-ricot? Whatta they got that you ain't got?
Courage.
Soooo, by the power vested in me by AWEs (get it, AWEs/OZ), I hereby bequeath to the cowardly Ms. Roboto what she clearly lacks. You dear, are now ordained as a card carrying member of Conspiracy Theorists R Us. Go forth and terrorize the natives on the world wide web.
I just knew Ms. Roboto and Princess Captain Gurl would finally combine their intellects. Together they reached 100 on the IQ scale. Yay!!! Such a milestone requires a commemorative photo. Smile guys. Or not.
CaptainGirl,
Denigrating others' bona fides is a standard MO (that's Method of Operation, Princess) employed by CTs, since they typically have NO bona fides. Thank you for verifying my assertion about you. Damn, you are easy. And I don't even have to call you in the morning (I DON'T have to call you in the morning, do I?).
Keep this up and I will have to start calling you my bitch.
