Hi Joe,
You got yourself a supporter in my person. I will write to
you more directly on your e-mail address, but here I wish to share
some observations and comments with the audience, which I hope, will
shed some further light on this subject and might even help someone.
You have an interesting theory here with "other interests"
using Malka's "natural" hate tendencies to forward their own agenda.
I will look into this and if you are right, I am sure a lot of people
will be interested.
But on an immediate basis I wanted to share an observation
which some might find interesting:
Cyril Malka has two children from a previous marriage and
lost their guardianship a couple of years ago and his ex-wife now has
both children. While fighting the case with his ex-wife, Malka had
posted all the documentation of their divorce case on the net and the
ex-wife took legal actions against him for this.
In normal circumstances I would not laugh about domestic
tragedies, but in this case I find it quite funny that such an
"expert", "councilor", "psycho-analyst" and whatever else he wants to
label himself with, is not even able to clean his dirty laundry in
private and must compulsively spread his dirt on a wide scale.
This is where the common denominator of his modus operandi
struck me in all its splendor: Cyril Malka is an expert at spreading
negative comments and if we look really at the scene it is a quite
fascinating psychological sickness: specializing is creating,
promoting, forwarding, spreading negative statements.
My God! I would hate to live in his skin.
Greetings,
Peter