This is one of those articles that disappears after you hit the submit button. Just click on the thread. I don't know why some newspaper articles do that, when others don't. Sorry about that!
Thanks!
are men cashing in on the female body?
mbulawa moyo
1/13/2005 8:00:56 am (gmt +2)
This is one of those articles that disappears after you hit the submit button. Just click on the thread. I don't know why some newspaper articles do that, when others don't. Sorry about that!
Thanks!
are men cashing in on the female body?
mbulawa moyo
1/13/2005 8:00:56 am (gmt +2)
Are men cashing in on the female body? Mbulawa Moyo 1/13/2005 8:00:56 AM (GMT +2) It was with some fascination, not altogether untinged with a little consternation bordering on trepidation, that I read and, slowly, began to digest the passage below. It is an excerpt from ?The Watchtower?, a periodical published semi-monthly by Jehovah?s Witnesses. | |
I quote: ?It is important that worshippers of God appreciate his view of leadership. The basic principle of headship is set out in 1 Corinthians 11:3 where it is written: ?The head of every men is the Christ; in turn, the head of a woman is the man; in turn the head of the Christ is God.? ?A man had priority in human creation. He is given priority of position over the woman. The woman was made from a rib taken from the men. she was created for the sake of the man, not the man for her sake. Therefore, the woman, in God?s arrangement, was always to be in subjection to her husband and not to usurp his authority.? (End of quote). Well, apart from the fact that the part of the above quote dwelling on the rib nonsense makes for scientific balderdash, some of the points advanced in this so-called ?Balanced views of headship? smack of men?s ever present self-seeking patronisation of women. Over the millennia men have sought to make women permanently subservient to them making them a convenience for their comfort and rather than partners. Men have seen nothing wrong in having several women as wives or sexual partners concurrently but have never allowed women the same rights, contemptuously referring to woman who have several sexual partners as ?whores? or prostitutes? even though they may not be demanding payment for sex with those several men in their lives. In fact, if the truth be told men have always treated women as objects of their sexual gratification at the very best, or, at worst as servants to minister to them at the man?s beck and call. Even worse, perhaps, is the fact that until recently men had never believed a woman could attain full adulthood. This is a view which is vividly illustrated in Nguni society (Zulu, Xhosa, Ndebele) where the women folk are referred to as ?abesintwana?. ?Umtwana? means ?a child?. Thus, ?abesintwana? is an expression classifying women as perpetual minors or ?children? from the cradle to the grave. This is a sexist view which was manifestly both unfair and unjust quite apart from being clearly oppressive which is why over the years, women, beginning with the suffragette movement in England in the 19th century, have been fighting relentlessly for equality of the sexes. That is equality before the law; equal educational opportunities, equal job opportunities, equal pay and so forth. But equality is not the same thing as being ?the same?. Men and women are intrinsically different in many ways but especially physically and emotionally. God made men physically much stronger than women which is why he made them head of the family. Not only can they command authority in the home because of their physical strength superiority but they can also protect everyone else in the home. But God is not stupid. In his great wisdom, he levelled off the two sexes intelligently making up a beauty for what he did not give women in physical strength or with bodies so lovely they can render the strongest of men effectively a lot weaker than the weakest of women. The biblical story of Samson and Delilah clearly demonstrates this. Using beauty of their bodies ? the lovely curves and contours or valleys and promontories they can get men to do practically anything they want. Women can have any man eat out of their hand, literally, and even get whatever money they want using only their beauty even when they have no brains at all to talk about which is precisely why women can live comfortably, all their lives, on what they earn from selling sex (their beautiful bodies) to men and never the other way round. And yet, foolishly, in this regard, women seem unable to count their blessings. When purely out of their own volition the more beautiful among them decide to make ? through posing half naked for photographs to advertise whatever commodities, some of their not-so-well-shaped but brainy sisters start to cry foul. ?Men are exploiting us,? they fume. Not only is this one of the most bizarre and misguided protests anyone could even come up with. It is also to slap God in the face for having done humankind?s female species such a great favour. It is like the proverbial ?looking a gift horse in the mouth?. Instead of being grateful to God for having favoured them so much that, in effect, they have the stronger of the two sexes by virtue of nothing else but the male-weakening beauty of their sexily voluptuous bodies, women rail against him for having so favoured them. We are being exploited by men, they complain. Exploited? Good gracious! When it is you who, in fact, is exploiting God?s free gift to your own financial advantage! Women can?t see a good thing for their incurable self-pity. As a matter of fact I was surprised that a little while ago even members of my own journalistic fraternity could have seen it fit to waste precious time debating allegations their certain advertisements were ?sexist?. At the Southern African Gender and Media Summit in Johannesburg recently, delegates were asked what constitutes ?sexist advertising?. Some of their views were startling to say the least. Here is a representative sample. ?It?s that picture, for instance, that shows a woman in the nude, her breasts and thighs exposed women are mainly used for such ads,? said SABC female journalist, Puleng Mokho-ane. Said another female delegate, Athaliah Molokomme: ?Pictures of women scantily dressed. I have seen an ad for cat food using the lower body of a woman. I thought it was an ad for stockings. I did not see the connection. ?The use of a woman?s curves to sell a car or anything at all is sexist. When the message being sent out is not about what the woman does or knows but about the shape of her body, it is sexist.? Nonsense. The beauty of the female body is not only an asset of immeasurable value but also the source of immense power which has enabled women to dominate men throughout history. To view its use in advertisement as exploitation is, to put it somewhat hyperbolically, to fail to see the wood for the trees. It is women who are using the beauty of their bodies to economically exploit society, not the other way round. After all, no woman has even been forced to pose for such pictures. |
credit for this article goes to (debbie), at watchtower observer.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
Elsewhere:
Would make for a pretty good (soap-opera) now wouldn't it?
Thanks!
credit for this article goes to (debbie), at watchtower observer.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
RunningMan:
Lets Get Ready To Rumble! Tickets to the next Bathroom brawl will be sold at the next convention!
I agree RunningMan, I did get a laugh out of it to.
Thanks!
credit for this article goes to (debbie), at watchtower observer.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
Bluesbrother:
Yep! Your probably right there Blues. Won't be finding this (experience) in the next Yearbook!
Thanks!
credit for this article goes to (debbie), at watchtower observer.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
Friends:
If you'll click on the thread, the article is a lot more clear to read than the cut and paste.
Thanks!
credit for this article goes to (debbie), at watchtower observer.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2005/01/11/news/porter_county/29e72e50d3863f8986256f8600176fee.txt.
Credit for this article goes to (Debbie), at Watchtower Observer.
*************************************************************************************************************
|
Cops: Woman attacks another at church This story ran on nwitimes.com on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:48 AM CST PORTER TOWNSHIP | A Valparaiso woman was arrested on a battery charge after she was accused of attacking another woman inside the Jehovah's Witness Hall at 198 W. Division Road. The victim, a 30-year-old Valparaiso woman, told police she was in the main sanctuary when she was told Griselle wanted to talk to her in the bathroom. The victim said she went to the bathroom, at which time Griselle stated she was sleeping with the victim's boyfriend. |
http://www.mwc.com/newsfeedarticle.cfm?newsid=8862 .
http://www.mwc.com/newsfeedarticle.cfm?newsid=8862 .
bloodless intensive care: a case series and review of jehovah's witnesses in icu .
http://www.mwc.com/NewsfeedArticle.cfm?NewsID=8862
http://www.mwc.com/NewsfeedArticle.cfm?NewsID=8862
************************************************************************************************
|
https://www.jwgift.org/main.asp?page=0
not sure if this has been noted here before but the uk jw donations website has a link described as " click here to donate to disaster relief.
who gets this then and what disaster will it benefit - bandwagon anyone ?.
Does the Watchtower meet these Guidelines? If not, then (Don't Donate)! I still have (not) seen ONE WORD of this tragic event even mentioned on their website !
http://www.cidi.org/donate.htm http://www.cidi.org/donate.htm
********************************************************************************************************
Guidelines for Appropriate |
|
Never (assume) anything when it comes to the Watchtower. And never take them for granted. There are too many (victims) out here already, due to the Watchtower Society.
Does the Watchtower (CLEARLY COMMUNICATE) to the public, as to how much money they are going to give for the relief efforts? Do you know how much money the Watchtower gave for the (LAST) disaster? If you do, will you please (scan) us a copy? If not, could it be because the Watchtower only used (some) of their disaster relief donations for the disaster victims, and kept the rest for (PRINTING) purposes?
Would you really want to donate to an organization that seems to be only concerned about the (Jehovah's Witness) victims, and does not have enough respect for the rest of the victims to even mention something about the disaster on their website? Does (Love Thy Neighbor), only apply for Jehovah's Witnesses?
yep, "godly obedience" is the theme for this years district convention.. you know the wts will be hot on obedience this year.. expect more wt articles asking for money (as obedience to jehovah), asking for more pioneers and elders, and making this a matter of obedience.. it's getting worse.. at the meeting this week, a whole 25 minutes was taken up on what to do regarding accomodation at the district convention.. brother zealous said if we're not obedient to the instructions that the faithful slave has given us, we undermine the hard work the society puts in to arrange these provisions.. godley obedience means we will attend all three days at our convention.. .
this cult makes me sick.
everything is about jehovah; jesus just does not figure in anything, unless they feel the need to quote a scripture or something.. .
truthseeker:
Absolutely right truthseeker. Accommodations are big business and because some areas are lacking the JWs move on to another area. One news article said that due to a (lack) of accommodations there was a (huge) loss with the JWs. It went from 64,000 JWs to a scheduled 16,000 JWs.
Its at the bottom of this thread: http://www.13wmaz.com/news/top_stories.aspx?storyid=9851
*******************************************************************************************************
After several canceled meetings with city leaders, Marshall says that process is at a standstill.
Marshall told Eyewitness News because of its lack of accommodations, the Centreplex has lost business.
She says they've gone from serving 64,000 Jehovah's Witness delegates in 2003, to a scheduled 16,000 in 2005.
Marshall says for three years in a row, the group opted to use the Gwinnett Civic Center in Atlanta.