Now you're being sarcastic elderlite, I have no need to repeat myself.
truthseeker
JoinedPosts by truthseeker
-
-
-
-
-
-
truthseeker
This is speculation on my part, but consider the passage in the scriptures where Jesus had gone without food for 40 days and 40 nights. He still lived, sustained by God's spirit. I'm not saying that's what happened, but it's something to consider.
-
-
-
truthseeker
thetrueone,
The Bible does not give all the specifics concerning the preflood era.
All things written beforehand were written as pieces for the jigsaw puzzle called the Bible.
These pieces are omitted unless they are essential to our learning process of understanding the complete truth.
Speaking or putting thoughts on tablets was no less a natural progression of God's purpose for mankind.
The Word does not mention every time someone went to the outhouse, but we know that the natural order provided for such things.
-
-
-
truthseeker
Elderlite,
It is apparent that nothing could convince you of something you have made your mind up about, that is why you tear holes in things you know little about. Your agenda is not one of openess but one of pulling down.
When you get your doctorate then maybe I'll pay attention to what you have to say, in the meantime I'll go with Dr. Terry Mortenson's findings.
-
-
-
truthseeker
thetrueone,
Since you're so fond of cut and paste...
http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/am/v2/n2/universality-of-flood
Noah’s Flood is critically important to the question of the age of the earth, as explains Dr. Terry Mortenson in his article on p. 62. For over eighteen centuries virtually all Christians understood Genesis to recount a universal Flood that completely covered the whole earth, leaving no dry land anywhere at the height of the event. However, during the past 200 years many Christians have been swayed by secular ideas and have abandoned the clear hermeneutic of Scripture for belief that the Flood was local and covered only the Mesopotamian Valley of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers (the area of modern-day Iraq). But such a view cannot stand under the careful scrutiny of Genesis 6–9 . Consider these points.
The Depth of the Flood
One of the most important biblical arguments for a universal (i.e., global) Flood is the statement of Genesis 7:19–20 , which says, “ And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered ” (KJV).
You do need not be a professional scientist to realize the tremendous implications of these biblical statements. If the highest mountains 1 were covered with water, the Flood would have been global in geographical extent, for water must seek its own level—and it must do so quickly!
The phrase “ fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail ” does not mean that the Flood was only 15 cubits deep, for the phrase is qualified by the one which immediately follows: “ and the mountains were covered. ”
Because Genesis 6:15 tells us that the height of the Ark was 30 cubits, nearly all commentators agree that the phrase “fifteen cubits” in 7:20 must refer to how deep the Ark sank into the water when it was fully laden. Such information adds further support for a universal Flood, because it tells us that the Flood “prevailed” over the tops of the highest mountains to a depth of at least 15 cubits. If the Flood had not covered the mountains by at least such a depth, the Ark could not have floated over them during the five months in which the waters “prevailed” upon the earth.
Now, if you think you know better than Dr. Terry Mortenson I'd be interested in your views.
-
-
-
truthseeker
thetrueone,
Don't flatter yourself, like most people here I have to work and eat and do all the other things so cannot be present at all times.
As for being rational, you picked some poorly made obscure video about the flood chronology which I already answered.
-
-
-
truthseeker
Wow, this thread has over 5,000 views.
I think this will be the thread to beat the flood horse to death.
-
-
-
truthseeker
thetrueone,
The only fact your video points out is that according to secular history, it would have been impossible for a global flood to have occurred during 2348/2370 BC since civilization existed during and before those times.
Since I do not subscribe to either of these dates, the evidence is non-sequitur.
-
-
-
truthseeker
N.Drew
God would have had to provide the wicked angels with bodies and reproductive capacity. You believe the head of Christ is God? The head of the angels therefore is God too. Of course. Why did God provide the angels the means to impregnate the women? Is God evil?
The account was about the women being overcome by the angels to do their will, instead of God's will. To influence people is always in their capacity as creatures with will. And the women also had will, but it was ruined by the angels. They had offspring. Yes, have you never heard of breeding? DNA? The angels could choose the mates that would produce what they wanted. People do it with dogs and horses. There is not enough evidence that they materialzed bodies and actually bred with the humans. And believing so tends to persuade me you don't know The Holy One.The angels were quite capable of pulsing down and taking on human form so having relations with humans would not have been insurmountable. However, they would have needed organic food to maintain their human body.
-
-
-
truthseeker
thetrueone,
I didn't say that civilizations existed throughout the flood, this would not be possible. I did mention I was not dogmatic with dates so I have no problem with the video. If the flood account is true, civilizations would have appeared after the event unless it was a localized flood.