Hi Reniaa,
A response to your previous post, context I think is a stupid thing to debate as it really just means "what you say doesn't agree with the way I interpret other scriptures".
"I and the father are one (oops and the holy spirit)"
and the question is.. One what? it doesn't say God even if like most trinitarians you imagine it there.
At John 17:20-23, Jesus prays for his disciples, "that they may all be onejust as as You Father are in me and I in You.... that, they may be one, just as we also are one." I think we can be pretty sure this does not add us to the Trinity and make us "God." Here we can see clearly that Jesus sees this oneness in terms signficantly different than what the Trinitarian would have us believe. The Trinitarian would like to pretend that Jesus was here praying for a oneness that is different than the oneness he declared at John 10:30 despite the fact that Jesus here twice says, "JUST AS WE ARE ONE."
I firmly believe this is a passage showing oneness of purpose and unity works showing that unity.
Ah, but according to what context. This is simply the way you interpret this scripture, while others would interpret it completely differently. You make it seem like you can't firmly believe something and be firmly duped. You also (possibly conviniently) forgot to bring in the verse right before hand that says "I make request, not concerning these only, but also concerning those putting faith in me through their word" which means when he's talking about unity of him and the Father and the disciples and Jesus he's talking about in their word which would mean in what they're teaching. So it's a completely different situation than what happened in John 10:30 where Jesus is DIRECTLY addressing the pharasees regarding saying he is the Christ. He tells them the gift The Father gave him, that they would not believe what he tells them because they are not his followers and finishes up with his strongest statement "I and The Father am One."
To me I don't see what it matters as no matter how many scriptures you quote I'll have several to refute it, no matter how many scriptures I have you'll have some more to refute it and either of us could be right and either of us could be wrong. You even put in your response that you believe, not that you KNOW.
As for other denominations, christeldelphians do not teach a real satan he is seen by them as some sort of nature we battle :sthey also tithe and celebrate certain Jewish festivals I think they may also keep the sabbath.
So what have you seen the Devil? You have proof he exists? Let me guess you're going to say that the bible refers to him as a person so that makes him exist. As if the bible never speaks in metaphor, I'm supposing the Old Man and Lazarus both exist, next the Prodigal Son must actually exist.
While bible students have good basic russel teachings they have no growth within their church.
Again we come back to growth in the church? Remember I said earlier that if growth is really proof of being the right religion then Islam, Mormonism, Catholicism, Protestantism, etc. must all be more favored than Jehovah's Witnesses.
Of course you're going to say "in THOSE cases it doesn't show divine approval, but in JWs case it does." What about the scripture "cramped is the road and narrow is the path that leads to everlasting life." You also just posted a scripture on the Mormons vs JWs thread that said few would be the ones finding the truth. So you're contradicting yourself, which is it? If the JWs are growing more than the Associated Bible Students according to the scriptures saying the true religion would be small the Associated Bible Students must be right.