I really disagree with that. Any therapist that insists that victims of abuse or war be able to remeber events without emotional impact is just incompetent. 'Moving on' clearly means different things in different situations. Moving on from a stupid argument with my wife means simply tossing it aside and not harboring hurt feelings. This is hardly possible for victims of serious abuse or war, or for many former JWs. Coping strategies that at some point (when the person understands what really happened and only assigns blame appropriately) include simply not deliberately thinking about past abuse are legitimate. Therefore if someone chooses to not discuss something painful, leave them have the peace that comes from having a disciplined mind. Perhaps that is the best that can be hoped for.
You can disagree all you want but you might want to look up some of the symptoms of PTSD which one of the main things is Avoidance Symptoms. My Father never even discussed Vietnam until recently, he avoided it like the plague. He wasn't over being in Vietnam at all, he hadn't really even addressed the thing at all. Even though he was a member of VFW and American Legion halls, he hung out with former veterans still in the vein of being "over it" he didn't talk about it. I fail to see how avoiding talking about a painful issue in life is moving on, it seems it's just avoiding it all together.
There's lots of articles about avoidance of key issues.
You should read Leaving the Fold by Marlene Winell.
Back on point though, does anyone have any articles that talk about this?