Again Mark you don't play by the rules. Funny how I am singled out and your posting continues. (Hmmmmmmm) Do you not know what a link is WITHOUT the whole article?
Jayson
JoinedPosts by Jayson
-
865
WoMD ... so where are they?
by Simon innow, the war is over, the weapons were not used and of course have not been found.. how threatening could they be if they did not even use them when being invaded by a massive force (of the countries they hate)?!
perhaps, as many suspect, they didn't use them because they didn't have them?.
now we're being told that we'll have to be patient and give them time to find them.
-
-
-
37
Disfellowshiping - Get a life
by Pepper indisfellowship
>> i have read many stories here about those who have been disfellowshiped.
they express the pain of the experience, and the emotional trauma they experience.
-
-
Jayson
Pepper remember when you were very young and you were taught that the rules were the rules and you must obey them. Well, when we grow up we learn that some things are wrong and must be opposed. The JW program is wrong. It distroys peoples faith in God and each other. It is evil. That word can discribe Hitler or, simply being misguided; It is when a thing is socially harmful. JW policy uses love as a weapon, a tool to hammer down any nail. It should be opposed. And because it is central to the doctrine the religion as a whole it must be opposed until it is changed. Just like the program to protect pedophiles. One reason I am here and educate myself is that I do what I can when I come accross people who have been trampled by JW zelotish rightousness. We are the kings of our own misery. We decide how much pain to endure and how we react. For me sharing my experiences is not something of pain or reliving a nightmare. It is letting people who are waking up for the first time that it's OK, they are not alone. It's a shock when you find out that everything you believe is an illusion. It's a comfort when those who call themselves "elders" no longer have power over you. It's good to have friends.
-
26
Just Another Issue
by MrMoe ini know right now you are sitting behind a computer, so you would be considered (at least by me and millions of others world over) to be... well... lucky.
here is where you react with your personal problems which are rather petty (sorry not trying to be rude here) life situations that amount to a hill of beans, barring extreme life circumstances, compared to say, that one guy who wears rags and talks to himself on the corner of main and broadway.
huh?
-
-
Jayson
I agree with you Simon.
To make being homeless a crime is to force the government to deal with it. No one should die in the cold of Westen Civilization. In America it is of the worst of shames imo. In my college years I was very active in the soup kitchens of my area. Now the program is much larger and I am not needed. But I think it would be good for everyone who wishes [it] to experience what I did.
-
62
Poll Suggests World Is Hostile Toward Great Britain
by minimus insince simon has proven everyone thinks poorly of the united states of america, it might be good to state the polls that we have seen lately, in the states.
actually, the headlines of newspapers and/or magazines are acceptable too.
here's one headline:" england sucks up to bush again!
-
-
Jayson
First let's point out MARK AKA SEARCHFORTRUTH's obession with posting whole articles that people even when scrolled over peices get picked up. Simon raked me over the coals for countering the propaganda posts. But again I doubt he will pull this link free horrid crime on JWD.
Second, yes France sucks. My grandparents are immigrants from there. They are rude and arrogant. Their economy sucks, their politics suck, and they sell nuclear capabilites to the likes of Saddam Hussien. However they have good wine, cheese, and a cool sounding language. I'd never pour out my case of their product I have. (let's not get carried away)
Brits are cool, and plenty are hotties. I love Simon of Teen-Idol. I think he is the average rude Brit, but they trust the lies of the BBC. I got a call to watch Fox today. They are in full swing countering the BBC bias poll program. The London Times representative backs up everything I said to Simon of JWD about the poll's questions being wrong to even ask. They biased the poll and they meant to. The Royal Navy of Britian pulled the BBC from their ships over the bias. But like the Times also said, how can opinion and, popular opinion be considered bias? That leads to another group of issues. How can Simon still run his I hate Fox news mantra and the BBC is as clean as a watchtower is to a witness mantra? You can't have it both ways.
-
26
Just Another Issue
by MrMoe ini know right now you are sitting behind a computer, so you would be considered (at least by me and millions of others world over) to be... well... lucky.
here is where you react with your personal problems which are rather petty (sorry not trying to be rude here) life situations that amount to a hill of beans, barring extreme life circumstances, compared to say, that one guy who wears rags and talks to himself on the corner of main and broadway.
huh?
-
-
Jayson
Being homeless should be against the law.
-
An article worth reading
by Jayson inin his latest traveling show, comedy superstar jerry seinfeld makes an apt and very funny point: why do cable tv news shows continually scroll the latest information across the bottom of the screens?
as seinfeld points out, this is television.
"if we wanted to read, we'd look at a newspaper," he says.
-
Jayson
In his latest traveling show, comedy superstar Jerry Seinfeld makes an apt and very funny point: Why do cable TV news shows continually scroll the latest information across the bottom of the screens? As Seinfeld points out, this is television. "If we wanted to read, we'd look at a newspaper," he says.
As usual, this humorist for our generation has put his finger on the essence of America and the new information age. News today is one wild and spinning circus. The secret to the survival of newspapers will come when their leadership and writers recognize the public really doesn't live or die based on our every written word!
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/matttowery/mt20030617.shtml
-
4
wondering who their friends are here (pun on words)
by Jayson inhttp://www.meadmaker.com/joke/up/friends.html simple friends and real friends
a simple friend can stand by you when you are right, but a real friend will stand by you even when you are wrong.
a simple friend identifies himself when he calls.
-
-
Jayson
http://www.meadmaker.com/joke/up/friends.html
Simple Friends and Real Friends
A simple friend can stand by you when you are right, but a real friend will stand by you even when you are wrong. A simple friend identifies himself when he calls.
A real friend doesn't have to.A simple friend opens a conversation with a full news bulletin on his life.
A real friend says, "What's new with you?"A simple friend thinks the problems you whine about are recent.
A real friend says, "You've been whining about the same thing for 14 years.
Get off your duff and do something about it."A simple friend has never seen you cry.
A real friend has shoulders soggy from your tears.A simple friend doesn't know your parents' first names.
A real friend has their phone numbers in his address book.A simple friend brings a bottle of wine to your party.
A real friend comes early to help you cook and stays late to help you clean.A simple friend hates it when you call after he has gone to bed.
A real friend asks you why you took so long to call.A simple friend seeks to talk with you about your problems.
A real friend seeks to help you with your problems.A simple friend wonders about your romantic history.
A real friend could blackmail you with it.A simple friend, when visiting, acts like a guest.
Real friend opens your refrigerator and helps himself/herself.A simple friend thinks the friendship is over when you have an argument.
A real friend knows that it's not a friendship until after you've had a fight.A simple friend expects you to always be there for them.
A real friend expects to always be there for you!How about some more uplifting stories. Personal, cliche's stories, jokes, just something nice.
-
203
Poll suggests world hostile to US
by Simon inan interesting read:.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.
some key bits:.
-
-
Jayson
Both of these sources are in previous posts I made.
http://times.discovery.com/convergence/rootsof911/rootsof911.html
New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, a three-time Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, spent several months traveling through the Muslim world last year, interviewing leaders and people of the street as he tried to uncover some of the causes of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. The resulting portrait of Muslim rage and distrust towards America is Thomas L. Friedman Reporting: Searching for the Roots of 9/11
My suggesting this as a non-bias documentary is this the proof of my ignorant pro Fox stance Simon? My inability to handle a critic of America? It goes in line with your poll thread as well as every other thread on this topic you start. But you dismiss it and me and end with an emotional insult.
"World on Fire" Amy Chua
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/results.asp?WRD=amy+chua&userid=4784HVUMWY
She is a Yale Professor.
From the Publisher
Every few years, a book is published about America's role in the world and the changing contest of global affairs that gets everyone thinking in a new way. Amy Chua's WORLD ON FIRE will have exactly that kind of impact on the debate of how the world has changed in light of the events of last September.
Apostles of globalization, such as Thomas Friedman, believe that exporting free markets and democracy to other countries will increase peace and prosperity throughout the developing world; Amy Chua is the anti-Thomas Friedman. Her book wil be a dash of cold water in the face of globalists, techno-utopians, and liberal triumphalists as she shows that just the opposite has happened: When global markets open, ethnic conflict worsens and politics turns ugly and violent.
Drawing on examples from around the world--from Africa and Asia to Russia and Latin America--Chua examines how free markets do not spread wealth evenly throughout the whole of these societies. Instead they produce a new class of extremely wealthy plutocrats--individuals as rich as nations. Almost always members of a minority group--Chinese in the Philippines, Croatians in the former Yugoslavia, whites in Latin America, Indians in East Africa, Jews in post-communist Russia--these "market-dominant minorities" have become targets of violent hatred. Adding democracy to this volatile mix unleashes supressed ethnic hatreds and brings to power ethnonationalist governments that pursue aggressive policies of confiscation and revenge. Chua further shows how individual countries are often viewed as dominant minorities, explaining the phenomena of ethnic resentment in the Arab-Israeli conflict and the rising tideof anti-American sentiment around the world. This more than anything accounts for the visceral hatred of Americans that has been expressed in recent acts of terrorism.
Bold and original, WORLD ON FIRE is a perceptive examination of the far-reaching effects of exporting capitalism with democracy and its potentially catastrophic results.I would love to hear how you box this in your Jayson is a puss who can't handle America being critizied. See Simon I can be of critical thinking and give real sources outside the BBC. Who is the source of your bias poll FYI. And that is just one more reason that I say you are not looking at all the facts. And to feed the hate bush feelings you have one just don't have to look beyond the BBC.
As for "awards" who is the BBC's competitors? Who funds them? Simon, saying that you are against all governments may excite the libertarians but for those of us outside of cults we don't by it. Saying that all parties must be met from the view of a skeptic is OK only if you are willing to cast judgment. That the poll you bring forth claims those polled see America and terrorists as equals and that you defend it mind you speaks for itself as to the ability to be a skeptic. As your dismissing the above sources of information, that shows something about you as well. You start the threads and then you can't hack it. If you don't want people to learn anything and your goal is to make people feel pissed off and pissed on, good job, your a god.
For those who really want to have some understanding, Americans for sure, look at the links and take the time to read up on what I have brought here. It's worth your time.
-
203
Poll suggests world hostile to US
by Simon inan interesting read:.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.
some key bits:.
-
-
Jayson
"jayson / thichi
I do not bother trying to answer you generally as you have show that you do not read or discuss thing but just paste articles that you've come across. Yuo are always quick to do what you have done now - declare victory for yourself with little regard to what really transpires. I don't really value your opinions to be honest as I find you to be closed minded and short sighted."
You don't answer Simon because you can't do so without deflating that ballon of hot air you type from. You never had issue when Mark posted your kind of hate mail. I can see by all the comments that everyone is so excited that you start threads like this. And like your blind bias and hate of GW that you can't control it is you who is showing little regard for the others here.
-
203
Poll suggests world hostile to US
by Simon inan interesting read:.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2994924.stm.
some key bits:.
-
-
Jayson
WH- Nope Simon won't start a new anti war/bush/americka/jay thread until this onw hits 500.
Simon I said you have a right to your opinion in this thread. You have never refuted anything that I have put up and only thrown back emotionism. Even when I start to walk away I get the perverbial push. You and your kind sure as hell cry the victim and if you deny that then you are more patholigical in your Bush obession than I thought. Did you ever consider that maybe just maybe your TV program the BBC which has been proven to be putting out false reporting about Iraq is so flooding the media airwaves of Europe with anti Bush retoric to take the pressure off of EU woes? To take the pressure off of your own leaders and the disaster in the relm of economy and foriegn policy that they have made of things. Like I have been saying you have nothing to add about cleaning up the mess in your Nation mush less the world but you have threads reaching the thousand mark about the problems of mine. Which only add up to one theme you keep putting out "I hate Bush." In my book that equals a fanatic. Did you ever consider that my postion is that I support the ideals of freeing Iraq from Saddam. Not because Bush can look real cool leaning on the podium. It's just that I think that Iraq deserves to be rebuilt and if we waited for Europe to get around to it it would be like the last 100 years. If Bush was willing to get the job done then I'm good to go. It's the act of action and not just the man that I support.