The "lab", the "controlled environment", the "controlled conditions", are NOT real world. In the real world, things happen when and where they happen.
Exactly. That is the point. The "real world" is riddled with human bias, flawed perception, and even open to intentional trickery by others. A controlled test is designed to eliminate those things so we can come to the actual truth.
Like I said, YOU must re-create, under the same conditions, EVERY experience, with proof in each re-created experience of your alternative explanation of that experience, for your "science" to have any validity.
As others have mentioned, that is flat out wrong. Proving a such negative is not possible. For example, I say a purple unicorn came into my house this morning and ate my car keys. You would rightly ask for objective evidence to back that up as my claim is extraordinary. I don't like that because I have no proof, just my subjective experience (even though I may feel it is hard evidence). If I were to ask you to prove that it didn't happen, could you? Nope. The fact that it is impossible to prove something didn't happen is not evidence that it did happen.
I'm not the one asking for proof of anything. YOU ARE.
I'm well aware of that. You are the one making the claim, though. Not me.