elderwho
So there, nanny, nanny boo, boo. Apperantley you dont like the onus.
LOL. Look, it is up to YOU to explain YOUR presuppostions. You are acting like there is proof of god, or a vlaid theory of how god came about. There is not. If you assert there is a god, prove it, don't partake in Shining One style intellectual dishonesty, you're better than that. Aren't you?
Or are not qualified to handle, said starting.
Even Microsoft Word would tell you that is a fragment of a sentence. When you finish it, I'll reply to it fully. Someone with your level of knowledge about evolutionary biology really shouldn't talk about qualifications, by the way; it's likely to make you look foolish and hypocritical.
If you think my belief re: starting of life is ridiculous then get it started for me
And what removes the same onus from you other than your complacent, primative, unproven belief in a skyman?
and please do not rely on "newspaper evolutionism."
Oh, I don't. The fact you have to misrepresent my argument (i.e., effectively lie about what I say) says more about the validity of your opinion than you'd probably like it to.
The fact theistic and nontheistic theories of origin of life are unprovable
Hey genius, there's reasoning in the corner of the round room.
Why do you want to make yourself look bad? Any fool can tell you have absolutely no argument of worth, only bluster and resentment. Engage in the discussion rather than imitating the vain posturing of such illustrious posters as hooby and Shiney, or be regarded as seriosuly as they are.