yea sure comf, guess it's one of those things where if you aren't involved it's hard to know the full story
but it's pretty simple - robot tried to bignote himself & make himself look like the author of the god disproved post when he wasn't.
He's already admitted he stole the info without crediting the real author down another thread but the search engine on this site is next to non existant so retrieval would take hours - i can find it if you want though (i wish we could search by author but until then if you dont remember the subject name it's a slog)
robot hasn't been game enough to try & pull the same stunt again since i brought it to his attention the first time.
robot will be jumping to his own defence here sooner or later so that should also offer further clarification.
my main gripe is being told i'm really everyone else on this site robot randomly and paranoically chooses and accuses and assumes without a shred of evidence.
he'll make those accusations in one post and then in the next spruik off his morally/intellectually "superior" BS about 51% burden of proof before guilt etc. - dont try and make sense of it comf because there is none.
essentially whats going on with robot (and allies with the same illness ) is he can't admit to himself he was stupid enough to make the mistake of becoming or being a witness just like everybody else here and somehow feels he has to justify/deny his stupidity in making that decision with displays of absurd "intellectualism" in a pathetic attempt to try and seperate and segregate himself from us even more stupid moronic fools who made the exactly the same mistake robot did despite having no "scholarly" qualifications.
i think i'm finally starting to understand the (INTOLERANT SELF DENYING) agendas here.
it's a joke, it makes me sick but thanks for asking.
AG
