I'm speechless. I listened to both recordings in their entirety. I think Matthew should get self-control award of the century.
Just the fact that you have 3 separate people questioning you(+ 2 other witnesses) and for that long of time saying that if you
disagree with JW teachings even in your heart you are evil is mind blowing. What happened there is they didn't like their authority being challenged.
It is much like politics such as when someone disagrees with them it is the automatic response to disagree back in order to save their pride and the
pride of their organization. Matthew did extremely well in sticking to his guns which I was hoping he was going to do even to the end.
One thing one of the elders on the "appeal" committee said was that the salvation message of the gospel was what Christendom teaches but not
Jehovah's witnesses. Really? So who put that in the bible? Some random guy- God didn't know what he was doing? Oops I slipped it in there again I
meant to speak about the kingdom more. This is definitely the most satisfying judicial committee I have listened to because the "wrongdoer" did
not give out or concede when they repeatedly were prying despite them claiming they were not. How many times did they ask for his personal views despite him telling them he wasn't going to discuss them? At least 50 that is my guess.
Oh and I noticed how much they said 'emmm'(scottish version of americans umm) was way way way more than Matthew did. This really tells something about them because that is what you have to do when you are reaching. Seriously listen to how many times they said 'emm' it is crazy.