Posts by KateWild

posted

13
any Near death experiences any one can relate
by baker in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbkgj5j91he.

this is as close as it gets to the other side....
KateWild

What exactly did he experience?
33
OK!!!!ITS ME!!!!
by brandnew in
1. jw
2. friends
so y'all dont think im always a lil mad puppy 😂😂😂.
KateWild

Brandnew,
Looking good
Kate xx x
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

SBF,
Good point that's something to think about
Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

Landy,
I am not trying to convince you to change your ideas. But you have disagreed without supporting your point with any scientific evidence I am wrong.
I don't want to be wrong any longer than is necessary, but with the scientific evidence I have its more probable to me there is a creator.
Thank you for your participation though
Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

Codedlogic,
My point is a scientific point and to be more specific the evidence that chemistry supports.
They way you ask multiple questions in one go suggests to me you're not really interested in my perspective. But I will answer as much as I can as I am on my phone right now.
I assesd the probability of an intelligent being guiding evolution by my study of chemistry. Cofty understands my points clearly and made an effort to research the chemistry and scientific studies himself and has drawn his own conclusion. I respect this very much. I suggest you read my responses to him and the articles he posted to get answers to your questions if you really want to understand my point of view.
Lol God could be an alien I haven't ruled that out. But alien just refers to not belonging or unknown.
I hope you have all the answers you need from all my posts thus far.
Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

Lol Cofty belittling my theory with rainbows and Jesus comments.....if you have to resort to this it weakens your ideas.
We just have a difference of opinion and it's good for lurkers to see
Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

Now, using simple organic molecules, the Imperial researchers have demonstrated that an amino acid itself can amplify the concentration of one particular chiral form of reaction product. Importantly, the experiment works in similar conditions to those expected around pre-biotic life and displays all the signs to suggest it may be a model for how biological homochirality evolved

This statement actually reinforces my theory that it was not natural it was engineered by the scientists. It just shows there had to be certain conditions to achieve homochirality. It could have been guided.

Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

Coded logic, I don't believe you are really interested in racemic mixtures verses homochiral mixtures and the formation of enantionmers in nature. But this type of chemistry is something you can't just Google. But if I am wrong we can start from the beginning xx
Cofty none of these articles convince me there is no creator. I am posting for the benefit of lurkers who are looking for answers, and for them to know we all leave with differing beliefs and ideas. I respect why you are atheist and I also respect others who believe in God.
13
any Near death experiences any one can relate
by baker in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbkgj5j91he.

this is as close as it gets to the other side....
KateWild

I call spam on this.......it a 98 min long promotional video for a book.....but have only watched a few minutes.
Kate xx
84
Why I'm not agnostic
by Coded Logic in
1. watchtower
2. beliefs
i think the time to be agnostic is when you have evidence on both sides of a claim.

for example, i'm agnostic about the existence of a historical jesus.

i think a reasonable case can be made that jesus was a man who was turned into a legend over a period of a couple of decades.
KateWild

There is nothing really new here. I respect the idea of atheism and also being agnostic. I also respect the belief of theism and deism.
I understand why people have certain beliefs and ideas and I can tolerate these ideas and beliefs.
Cofty has said my reasons for a belief in a Creator are bucket chemistry. Dismissing my argument like this does not convince me I am wrong. No one has been able to help me see why my argument is flawed with scientific evidence. So with the scientific evidence I do have and then apply Ocams Razor....for me it's more probable there is an intellectual being responsible for guiding evolution in the early stages of amino acid formation.
Kate xx