smiddy ,,, I liked Clarence better * grins *
[Edit: though I loved Harvey, and ONLY Jimmy Stewart could have played in that flick.]
.
"Every time a bell rings ... an angel gets his wings."
the question as to what believing in this entity called god entails is a fairly important question that needs to be answered first.
to me, the key difference between a universe in which god exists versus one where god doesn't lies in the idea of teleology.
in my view, a universe with god entails some sort of process towards an end, an end which can be characterized with words such as bliss and unity and others.
smiddy ,,, I liked Clarence better * grins *
[Edit: though I loved Harvey, and ONLY Jimmy Stewart could have played in that flick.]
.
"Every time a bell rings ... an angel gets his wings."
the question as to what believing in this entity called god entails is a fairly important question that needs to be answered first.
to me, the key difference between a universe in which god exists versus one where god doesn't lies in the idea of teleology.
in my view, a universe with god entails some sort of process towards an end, an end which can be characterized with words such as bliss and unity and others.
I can't deny the sense of calm I've felt after praying, for example.
This is a good example.
If you learn about 'mindful meditation' (ie, google or visit your local library if you like books, and find credible sources, read, and make a logical conclusion), you will find that it accomplishes the same thing. In fact, it is recommended by medical practitioners as a valid form of relaxation for people with MI and cancer.
There is a strong argument to be made for 'prayer as meditation' ... ie, when praying, you enter a stage of dissociation that is akin to meditating, and the mind empties, the heart rate slows, and voila - calm.
Prayer = a religious form of meditation. *
.
* It should be noted that some religions validate and include meditation as part of their practice. xx tal
mailing packages with garlic bread enclosed to still in family.
Muddy Waters I thought your comment was funny, and is not this whole thread 'tongue in cheek'?
Yes, because THIS:
[Edit: And what NN said, in his earlier comment.]
.
.
.
.
Years ago, there may have been the excuse of 'ignorance', but nowadays? NO FRICKIN' WAY!
mailing packages with garlic bread enclosed to still in family.
How about a garlic necklace? The garlic bread is so "Anthony Morris", and hey, the necklace could really send a message. : D
.
here is what i would name my band(s) let see if you can list some funny ones as well.
here is my list:.
local needs.
Armageddon
Lucifer's Child
Desert Wanderers
The Resurrection
(they just keep comin' .. okay, I'm done .. : P)
here is what i would name my band(s) let see if you can list some funny ones as well.
here is my list:.
local needs.
The 144,000
The Four Horsemen
David's Sluts
Angles in Sodom (alternatively, Angles in Gomorrah)
Jezebel's Bitches
here is what i would name my band(s) let see if you can list some funny ones as well.
here is my list:.
local needs.
The Double-Lifers
Rebels Without A Clue
Big Brother & The Elderettes (more Mo'Town)
The Pioneers
court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.
a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.
http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.
tgnd
reading comprehension
Yes, I have found this skill sadly lacking in some posters; either that, or they are being remarkably disingenuous. : P
court denies summary judgement for laurel jehovah's witnesses congregation.
a motion for summary judgement is denied in a case against the laurel congregation of jehovah's witnesses and some individuals over child abuse reporting issues.a lawyer for the congregation maintained that elders were exempted from reporting requirements under a state law because of clergy privilege and confidentiality.the case resulted from allegations that elders did not report an unlawful sexual relationship between a woman and a 14-year-old boy, both of whom were members of the jehovah's witnesses congregation.. download the court opinion here.
http://courts.delaware.gov/opinions/download.aspx?id=235880.
Yeah...just wait until that case in Newfoundland moves ahead.
Yes, that's right @ OC. I was wracking [what's left of] my brain, because I knew there was something. Still waiting to see names (or may have missed info), since I knew quite a few in that area, back in the day. Very sad, but I am always glad to see the secrets come out (that is healthy) and the Tower exposed for what it truly is. Not a Paradise, but a Dungeon.
I have no more to say to the troll, and I see that D-D,(ahahaha, love Nelson!) already said it best.