looter

Joined

• started 11 topics
• posted 295 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by looter

• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  "No it isn't. It is a commitment to be led by evidence." That means you're faithful of the evidence. Faith and belief are almost the same thing if not the same thing. Even the evidence that can be verified by anyone can be mistaken. But honestly, that's not the case most of the time but it's always possible. And people have believed incredible things forever without evidence but eventually it turned out to be true. You never know, you could say that now, but there could be refutable evidence that a God does exist some day. But I see that you are not too competent on possibility which is understandable, cofty.

  
  "If they want to claim their belief is rational then let's hear the evidence." Christians believe in God based on the testimony and evidence supplied to them by those who were in a position to receive the evidence when it was available, even though we are not able to verify that evidence empirically today because it is no longer available to us. Whether it's true or not is up to the person to decide. It's just like future scientists should believe in the cosmology described by today’s scientists based on the evidence they acquired when such evidence was available, even though future scientists will not be able to verify that same evidence empirically in their own day.
  
  
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  "Being rational means that our belief is commensurate with the evidence" Very true. But being rational is still a belief in itself though because you are trusting that something is true but under the view of verification. Not everyone sees this the same way obviously. There is always the case where "evidence" isn't totally believed or even explainable.

  "Therefore theism is irrational." That doesn't mean it's irrational just because there is no refutable proof. If God exists then belief in him is rational. If he does not exist, then it isn’t. No one knows whether he is real or not but people can believe he does or he doesn't. To say there is no proof is a belief but a logical one because while there may not be refutable proof some still believe there is proof.

  "I still have no idea what your OP is about. Why won't you tell me?" Look, cofty, I've already tried to explain this and I'm not going through that again. If you don't understand, you just don't understand. Don't be giving me headaches, I'm just a boy.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  "I would recommend that you learn the art of speaking for yourself and yourself only. "We both just need" is an inappropriate phrase because you simply don't know my needs. You may need to remember that but I don't." That was said because you don't seem to understand beliefs can be both rational and irrational. It's really at the foundation where someone's head is. Not sure if you refuse this observation or just don't believe in it. "Belief is ALL about the irrational." No. Not at all. Have you ever thought that rationality itself is actually a belief? Of course it uses the laws of action and reason but rationality like irrationality is a state of mind and a natural wiring of someone's brain. People naturally can be either rational or irrational. Rationality implies the standards of one's beliefs with one's reasons to believe.

  So basically you're saying that if I believe someone can do good and better then that is using an irrational part of my mind. That's bogus because we can believe in things that are entirely rational and possible but not necessarily will happen. That's labeling so many things everyone may have confidence in all in to one baseless bubble. Please just know that a belief can be rational, irrational, or even both. The whole concept of belief does not require illogicality but rather what position someone's intelligence is, which is either different or slightly different for everyone since we're all unique. Oh, and the scientific method itself uses a belief system. Now I'm not saying it is a belief system but it applies a belief system which is about how certain people see the world, which again is different for everyone.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  What I said was that you didn't understand my answers to some of your questions which led to you asking me something different, cofty. That's how it got off topic. I never refused to explain what topic we had at hand and my point of view. My main topic was already explained in my original post yet you kept thinking I was talking about a physical and creative God which led to a bunch of unrelated stuff that doesn't really pertain to what I was trying to say in my original OP.

  Don't keep saying it was my fault when you clearly misunderstood what I was trying to say and continued to ask questions that while similar weren't related to what was said. I just went along and told you my stance on what you were asking. I feel that it was explained the best way possible in the original post. You misinterpreted like most on here and think this is trying to say that God really exists in the sky and that's not what I meant.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  But that's what I'm saying. Someone can have believe in that rational side. Whether a belief is irrational or not depends entirely on what is meant by irrational in this context. A person who believes in God on the basis of considered evidence and reasoning is not irrational. They might be mistaken, but that is true of almost any belief-even those in the sciences. We both just need to remember that some people who believe in God are irrational in their belief and others are rational in their belief.

  The same can be said about any belief. People believe scientific claims without adequate justification, yet no one would say that the belief in science is irrational. The belief in God deserves the same treatment. To do otherwise is a senseless and needless insult to those who carefully consider the rather important matter of God and find that reason and evidence point them towards belief.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  I liked what you said. But you remarked, "rationality does not require belief." Neither does being irrational. I know a few people who are as unreasonable as they come but have utterly no type of belief in God, any form of righteousness, or ethics whatsoever. On top of everything, rationality not necessarily needs a belief in God but what my point is, non op, is that it can.

  And just because someone doesn't feel it is needed doesn't give them the right the blatantly treat another persons view like it's garbage. Seriously, being different doesn't mean wrong. So many believers and non believers don't understand this ideology even when it's as simple as simple gets.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  It's not that I'm "trying to reconcile irrationality with the rational world". That what you call "irrationality" is just another way individuals are able to be practical and problem solvers. Obviously when it involves hurting and extreme actions it could be called irrationality. But when an atheist or just anyone who isn't religious does equivalent things, that can be called unreasonable as well. Besides, believers think not believing is irrational so it really is just a different mode of thinking.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  That's not my fault either, sparky1.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  Exactly. But since when does calling someone intelligent equate with insulting them? All she did was point out one underlying issue with our conversation. Not disrespectful in any way at all. It pains me that you think that.
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  looter

  What did I just read? OrphanCrow, how dare you believe that what Kate said is insulting. It is absolutely in no way insulting. She just said that he is unable to understand my views because he has his own. Period. If you read this entire topic, it's pretty clear that this is the case. Just because it's true doesn't mean she was being conceited.

  She even called him very intelligent because he evidently is. However, every time I attempted to explain he completely misinterprets it and asks me another question based on his misinterpretation. That's not my fault if he just can't possibly grasp in mind it. It's okay if he disagrees but in this case he doesn't even understand.