"There are animals that use tools and solve problems. Animals certainly can be sensible." But who is usually more sensible and more capable of being sensible? Rational thought is what makes humans special. A human beings main advantage over an animal is their intellectual capacity. That's exactly why I used the word unique. Our ability to be knowledgeable is uniquely superior to animals even though there are always exceptions like the case you said. But we're talking general with that here and it's actually another topic all together.
"It's not difficult at all. Summarize your point, then write as much or as little as you need to support your point(s). Use logic, critical thinking, evidence and reasoning to explain the connections and form your argument." I already did that in my original post. What more can I explain when it's clear a vast number of you guys just don't get my idea? Not much at all. The more I try to explain it under you guys' questions, the more off topic it gets because you still don't understand that main underlying principle I set out and I cannot make you or anyone understand it. That's why it never gets anywhere.
"You literally could not be more wrong if you tried. There is no level of wrongness more than what you achieved with that sentence. It's approach the level of "not even wrong"." Why? Irrationality really is another manner in which we are able to survive and deal with the world. You don't seem to see that irrationality like rationality is a basic form of human cognitive function and that compact rationality is not naturally attainable to every human being even though they could still possess basic human action.
"The scientific method was developed of thousands of years across many cultures as a way to investigate reality without allowing human bias to influence the investigations. The very fact that you are alive and using a computer to post your comments instead of using spirit to do so is proof of that." I'm grateful of that process as everyone should but you act like the scientific method is infallible. The fact that it was developed over several hundred years tells of how much it has changed from the first incarnation. And it will do nothing but continue to change as humans get wiser and wiser. This seems to be the case with replicability of a scarce amount of confirmed science. For you to say I'm alive because of the scientific method shows that you view it in the same light as a believer does to God.