Found this mate.
NEW YORK – An $850 million settlement by the Boy Scouts of America to
compensate sex-abuse victims prompted outrage on Friday from some
survivors and their advocates, while others were encouraged and seen as
the best outcome. which could have been achieved under the
circumstances.
The
settlement, filed in court late Thursday as a step toward resolving a
complicated bankruptcy case, includes BSA national leadership, abuse
victims, local Boy Scout councils and lawyers appointed to represent
victims who will file future claims. can do.
Lawyer Tim Kosnoff,
whose Abused In Scouting legal team says it is representing thousands of
clients, called it “a lousy deal – selling thousands of brave men”
because it contributed large portions of its unrestricted assets to
local councils not pressured to do so.
Chris
Anderson, a Southern California accountant who says he was abused by a
Boy Scout troop leader for more than three years in the 1970s, spoke
about the lack of details about the council’s finances. Complained.
“It’s a farce,” he told the Associated Press. “There is no certainty for the victims.”
However,
some lawyers representing the survivors welcomed the settlement as the
best that could be achieved. He noted that negotiations with insurers
of the Boy Scouts have yet to be resolved, which could potentially need
to contribute billions of dollars to the compensation fund.
“This
is just the tip of the iceberg,” said attorney Ken Rothweiler, whose
firm says it is representing more than 16,000 survivors. “Now we go
after the next step and see what happens with insurers. “
The BSA
sought protection from bankruptcy in February 2020, moving to prevent
thousands of lawsuits by men who had been molested as youth by
Scoutmasters or other leaders decades earlier. The filing was intended
to attempt to reach a global resolution of abuse claims and create a
compensation fund.
Richard
Mason, an attorney and chairman of an ad-hoc committee representing
local councils in the case, said this week’s reorganization agreement is
the result of hard-fought negotiations and that plaintiffs’ lawyers
“pushed too hard.”
Mason, who is also the chairman of the BSA’s
Greater New York Council, said councils are contributing “the most that
is achievable”.
Irwin Zalkin, whose
law firm represents about 150 survivors, warned against reading too much
into the agreement, noting that many questions remain unanswered.
These
include what percentage of local councils they deserve will contribute;
what, if anything, local sponsoring organizations such as churches and
civic groups can contribute; And how much will be set aside to cover
future claims.
“I think it’s an absurdity to issue a media release
to the victims saying they’ve reached a settlement for $850 million,
especially because of the way they’re doing a victory dance about it.”
are,” he said. “To me, I just find it reprehensible.”
Lawyer Paul
Mons, who represents hundreds of abuse victims and supports the
reorganization agreement, said the plaintiffs’ lawyers pushed the BSA
and local councils as far as they could.
“We believe this is the
best that could have been done,” he said, acknowledging that abuse
survivors could still vote to decline the agreement.
Zalkin and
other critics note that the councils have more than $1.8 billion in
unrestricted assets, but are contributing only $600 million to the
victims’ fund. Mons pointed out, however, that many council properties
have land-use or donor restrictions, making them unavailable to
compensate abuse victims.
Mons said that no matter how much the
BSA and local councils contribute or how much insurance companies may be
forced to pay, no amount can compensate abuse victims for their
suffering.
“It’s not a victory for anyone,” he said. “We’re
dealing with these people’s lives after a disaster, and we’re trying to
make things back with whatever raw materials we have left.”
The
Associated Press contacted several local Scout councils across the US on
Friday. Most of the leaders who responded said they did not yet know
whether they would be asked to contribute and hoped they would not have
to sell valuable properties such as camps.
Doug Stone of the Indian Waters Council in South Carolina said he would not have to sell his camp or any other property.
“We
own Camp Barstow outright,” he said. “We’re not going to put a
mortgage on it. We’re not going to sell it. It’s going to stay.”
However,
Roger Mosby, BSA’s president and CEO, told the AP earlier this week
that some councils will be faced with “a difficult and often emotional
decision” regarding the sale of the camp.
Some councils have already taken steps in this direction.
The
Greater Hudson Valley Council, which serves several counties near New
York City, put three of its camps up for sale earlier this year as part
of its obligation to fund. The largest is Durland Scout Reservation, a
1,385-acre property in the Putnam Valley that includes two lakes.
Another
is Camp Bulova in Stony Point, where a local official has inquired
whether the city can purchase it and retain it for scouting and other
entertainment.
In Maine, the Pine Tree Council has proposed
selling two campsites to raise money for the fund, according to the
Kennebec Journal. The council did not immediately respond to emails and
phone messages for updates on Friday.
The BSA praised the
agreement in a statement on Friday, saying it would help local councils
contribute “without an additional drain on their assets”.
“There
is still a lot to be done to get approval from the court to urge the
survivors to vote for the revised plan of restructuring the BSA,” it
said. “We intend to confirm the plan this summer and emerge from
bankruptcy later this year.”
Membership in the BSA has declined
sharply since 2019, from more than 1.9 million Scouts across its two
major programs to less than 770,000.
From Nation World News
jtg