Any other astronomical tablets worth looking at other than Vat $956 and the other one that had a video on it in this thread?
possiblepineapple
JoinedPosts by possiblepineapple
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
Other than the business tablets are there any other tablets that show the transition from one king to another? Particularly in regards to Nebuchadnezzar and Amel Marduk
Also how do the Babylonian chronicals fit into fixing chronology? Sorry to ask so many question but I know a lot of people on here have studied this stuff in depth to the point that they're practically experts on the subject.
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
Doesn't that pretty much shove a huge hole in the extra years of Nebuchadnezzar? Considering that thing is from the time as well, wouldn't it also dispell any idea of other kings inbetween (since I think the babylonians would know their own bloody kings)
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
also whats this about the Addagoppe stele? I can find almost no information on it via the web but I've seen that she died at 104. If we were to push dates back 20 years would this make her 124?
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
It also looks on the picture on lavia, that there are multiple references to 37 on the tablet rather than just the one at the start, along with the number 38, so surely this proves that it is most likely dated to the 37th year?
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
I also don't understand why Furuli believes the tablet would say "57" rather than "37" considering Neb never had a 57th year. Would people have even had the ability to change the tablet back in 1915 (which I do believe is when the first photograph of vat 4956 was taken)? Does Furuli at all intend to have someone look at the tablet and confirm whether or not it was tampered with, or is he just going to leave it as a hypothesis, because until he does this I don't know how anyone can take his "hypothesis" seriously until he does.
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
Have there been any responses to the third edition? I've only seen stuff in response too the second edition.
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
It also seems rather unprofessional of F. to make such an assertion without actually confirming it with a specialist, he should really have gotten in contact with someone to verify or dispell his claim rather than just making assumptions like this. F. clearly isn't a stupid man, but he's no historian and should really be contacting people who specialise in the subject.
Has anyone on here gotten in contact with anyone who could dispell or verify this claim?
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
http://www.lavia.org/english/archivo/VAT4956en.htm
I was looking at this website, and assuming thats an actual picture of the tablet itself, I don't see how it could have been tampered with, although correct me if I'm wrong on it being the actual copy.
-
93
Rolf Furuli's accusation about VAT 4956 being tampered with?
by possiblepineapple ini'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about.
i saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both coj and hermann hunger but how?
how does rolf furuli know that it was tampered with?
-
possiblepineapple
I'm sorry but can someone here explain what this is about. I saw someone on here called scholar on here saying that it somehow destroyed both COJ and Hermann Hunger but how? How does Rolf Furuli know that it was tampered with? Why would anyone tamper with it? How would a person back in 1915 have tampered with the tablet without the necessary technology to make it look credible? I just don't understand this assertion, it makes no sense. Does anyone on here understand it better?