FLN. No! She is 68, I'm 63. No one robbed the cradle
Blueblades
wow!
today we have been married for forty years!
where did the time go.
FLN. No! She is 68, I'm 63. No one robbed the cradle
Blueblades
wow!
today we have been married for forty years!
where did the time go.
StAnn 53rd Wow! I hope we can catch up. I love her so much.
Blueblades
wow!
today we have been married for forty years!
where did the time go.
Bonnie / Clyde Happy 45th, we hope to catch up to you.
Blueblades
wow!
today we have been married for forty years!
where did the time go.
Just got home. Wow, thanks everyone for all your thoughts. For better or worse in our vows. I always tell my wife that I got the better and she got the worse, ha ha.
Blueblades
wow!
today we have been married for forty years!
where did the time go.
Wow! Today we have been married for forty years!
Where did the time go. Two sons and one grandson.
Blueblades
does anyone know about the legalities of sending a letter when you move congregation, that in many cases contains a pack of lies about you and claiming they can't show you it as it's 'confidential'?
The BOE. of the cong. that is receiving the letter of introduction will have a wait and see attitude, weeks to months to determine how they should proceed with the new members coming into their cong. Basically they will watch and see how many hours that they put in the field service and how their meeting attendance is. Those will be the determining factor in how much of the introduction letter they will accept as being the full picture of what they are being told about the individual / individuals.
It always comes down to the field service and meeting attendance as a litmus test of ones spirituality.
BTW. Unknown to the rank and file is, Yes, you can read the introduction letter and contest any remarks you deem not appropriate.
Blueblades
beginnings are always difficult.
wherever one starts, there is always the question: what was before that?
this question comes from our sense of objective causality - that everything must be preceded by its cause.. must everything have a cause?
Most of us are awash with beliefs of all sorts. We are steeped in the common sense and prevailing wisdom of our culture, traditions, communities, profession, family, and friends. Because belief is very personal for each of us, a discussion of belief and knowledge comes from many different directions.
Blueblades
beginnings are always difficult.
wherever one starts, there is always the question: what was before that?
this question comes from our sense of objective causality - that everything must be preceded by its cause.. must everything have a cause?
We all have a belief system and that is actually a trap, hence, the belief trap. It is ones culture that starts the belief trap. To admit ignorance is very difficult. We wrap ourselves inside our belief system like an ostrich putting his head in the ground.
Whatever gets us through this life, it is what it is, etc,etc.
It really is a small world after all. Each has its own culture belief system that comes from where each of us were and are born.
Everyone has a corner on knowledge and truth, until we die, then.....who really knows...oh I do, you see I have this belief that such and such is the truth. Don't tell me, you too!
Blueblades Have a merry whatever it is you celebrate according to your belief system, your culture, etc.
beginnings are always difficult.
wherever one starts, there is always the question: what was before that?
this question comes from our sense of objective causality - that everything must be preceded by its cause.. must everything have a cause?
Beginnings are always difficult. Wherever one starts, there is always the question: What was before that? This question comes from our sense of objective causality - that everything must be preceded by its cause.
Must everything have a cause? If "no," then one leaps immeadiately to invoking mystical beginnings. If "yes," then the beginning is a logical impossibility. There can, by definition, be no beginning if everything must have a cause.
By the logic of causality, beginnings are illogical. The logic of causality requires ( because we DO exist ) the intial existence from which we are derived to erupt spontaneously from nothing.
Clearly, the notion of objective causality must violate its own logic in order to get started.
The other alternative, there is no beginning, existence is somehow infinite and perpetual, is itself a mystical assertion that comes from nowhere and goes nowhere. Such an unbounded mysticism offers its supporters no possibility of either answers or clues.
From the theory of everything.
Blueblades, just keeping it simple.
that's the latest being circulated from our dear witness friends and relatives.
You will never grow old.....................................Remember that one? Well we have all grown old since that one was the call of the day.
Blueblades