little_Socrates

Joined

• started 12 topics
• posted 303 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by little_Socrates

• 
  10

  A violation of the separation of Church and State?

  by Londo111 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so i went to dmv this morning.... can someone explain how this does not violate the separation of church and state?.

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  O yea... there is no such thing as "separation of church and state" in the constitution. On the other hand there is this establishment cause.
  
• 
  26

  Evolution is a Fact #7 - Human Egg Yolk Gene

  by cofty in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  exploring the human genome is like roaming around an historic town.

  some places are pristine and obviously still in everyday use.

  others have been unused for a while and starting to show signs of decay and if you look carefully there are relics of buildings that were abandoned long ago.. in this post we are going to look at a gene that we still carry in every cell in our body but which fell into disuse 10s of millions of years ago.. humans are placental mammals.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  Hi Cofty this is very interesting science indeed. I do learn from your post.

  That being said.... I don't like the statement "Evolution is a Fact" No one can prove that statement. Now Evolution might be the best way to explain all the science and observations that biologist make. It also seems to work in a "predictive" sense. So it is very useful.

  Maybe a statement such as "Evolution is good strong science with lost of supporting evidence" would be much more accurate.

  
  Scientists should be curious and open minded.  Everything should be questioned.
  
• 
  40

  Are you ready for armageddon?

  by atomant in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  just imagine the panic.disbelief.oh my god they were right.then you pee in your pants.what will l do?the plea for forgiveness.please let me through.l promise l''ll change.l didn;t mean what l said on that jw.com site.l was jokin.then you wake up it was only a dream.disbelief turns to relief.

  but it could happen..

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  LOL
• 
  166

  2nd amendment right ... where should it end?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  one thing i like to do to test a theory is to take things to extremes or to their logical conclusion to see if the premises still hold.

  very often, a claim that seems to make sense at a superficial level falls apart when you start to stretch it a little.. so let's play a game.. suppose the 2nd amendment is valid, that some "well regulated militia" really is necessary to hold the government to account.. obviously when this was drafted the government had access to the weapons of it's day which would be muskets!

  so muskets all round.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  The point being that when you avail the purchase or ownership of semiautomatics to the general public, you are essentially making the devastation greater for a potential massacre event.

  I don't think this is correct at all. First of all if I was gong to do a mass shooting... I would use a shot gun not a semiautomatic rifle/handgun. Also the worst mass murders of all time had nothing to do with guns. Stuff like fertilizer, box cutters, or even gasoline and a match have proven to be MUCH more effective than firearms.
  
• 
  166

  2nd amendment right ... where should it end?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  one thing i like to do to test a theory is to take things to extremes or to their logical conclusion to see if the premises still hold.

  very often, a claim that seems to make sense at a superficial level falls apart when you start to stretch it a little.. so let's play a game.. suppose the 2nd amendment is valid, that some "well regulated militia" really is necessary to hold the government to account.. obviously when this was drafted the government had access to the weapons of it's day which would be muskets!

  so muskets all round.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  I just noticed your reference to Oregon.... okay fair enough. However this movement didn't have the support of the local population, and just had few people involved in it at all.

  How quickly you forget about a very similar situation from Nevada a while back. You might feel that the Bundy's where wrong and the government was right, that is fine I don't want to argue that point. However in this situation they had the local populations support, sheriff support, and LOTS of armed men. In this situation the government DID back down. The people got to defend what they thought was their right, and everybody went home safe and sound.
  
• 
  166

  2nd amendment right ... where should it end?

  by Simon in

  1. social
  2. current

  one thing i like to do to test a theory is to take things to extremes or to their logical conclusion to see if the premises still hold.

  very often, a claim that seems to make sense at a superficial level falls apart when you start to stretch it a little.. so let's play a game.. suppose the 2nd amendment is valid, that some "well regulated militia" really is necessary to hold the government to account.. obviously when this was drafted the government had access to the weapons of it's day which would be muskets!

  so muskets all round.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  You notice in the amendment it links "militia" and the right of the people to bare arms. In no way do I believe that the founders of the constitution meant the right only to extend to side arms. Weapons of war where meant to be included. Private ownership of large weapons of war was not that uncommon at least until civil war era. Your question becomes nonsensical when you talk about modern weapon systems simply due to the costs involved. Even Bill Gates probably couldn't afford to buy and operate an aircraft carrier.

  I have a counter question for you.... Can you point to any part of the constitution that would grant the government the power to limit the peoples right in this regard?
  
• 
  4

  Prescription Drugs and the Fruitage of the Spirit?

  by Luther bertrand in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  does anyone have a meaningful response to the following question/points: the fruitage of the spirit found at gal.

  5:22: love, joy, peace, long-suffering, mildness, kindness.

  goodness, faith and self-control, in many way for many people can be increased through the use of anti-anxiety, anti-depressants, and a host of other pharma's.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  The way I see it, at most those drugs help some people function in more socially acceptable ways. I don't think they are capable of giving people real feelings of Love joy peace ext.
  
• 
  238

  Another mass shooting, three or four hours ago.

  by James Mixon in

  1. social
  2. current

  san bernardino california.

  up to 12 people have been killed.. the center a private non-profit agency that assists people with developmental.

  disabilities.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  There are two facts at play here...

  First it seems as though so much of the craziness on the world stage is coming from Muslims.
  

  And secondly we all know most Muslims are not terrorists. They just want to live a peaceful life with a different culture and religion than our own.

  I will be honest here... It is very difficult to reconcile those two thoughts in my head. It is hard not to be biased against the whole religion. How do we tell the two groups apart?
  
• 
  238

  Another mass shooting, three or four hours ago.

  by James Mixon in

  1. social
  2. current

  san bernardino california.

  up to 12 people have been killed.. the center a private non-profit agency that assists people with developmental.

  disabilities.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  sloppyjoe... the point is that guy had a choice. He did what he felt was best for himself at the time. It also helps to confirm that most concealed carry holders are very responsible and don't just go off half caulked. Apparently no one else there had a choice. Their only option was to hide and hope for the best.
  

  If you had to go through the same ordeal... would you honestly prefer NOT to be armed?
  
• 
  34

  Hypothetical question. There is no more guns on our streets, would the crime rate go down?

  by James Mixon in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  it would eliminate drive by's (gangs).

  bank robbery.

  ( handing the bank teller a note, this is stick up without a gun).

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  little_Socrates

  I can imagine a world with less guns as being a safer place.

  However I think the push towards gun laws are misguided. I don't think they will accomplish what the proponents expect.

  Making something illegal =/= getting rid of it entirely.(sometimes it has the opposite effect)