I would have thought somebody with 2 degrees would know better than to pass of a copy-paste as their own words.
One would think.
I would have thought somebody with 2 degrees would know better than to pass of a copy-paste as their own words.
One would think.
No DEGREE Viviane ? Where thes "classes" in a Community College ?
I am curious why you are focusing on me rather than on correcting your errors.
Do you even know what that means ? "transferable" ???
I am curious why you are focusing on me rather than on correcting your errors.
Where you accepted into a University based on your grasp of mathematics science, and general background with a 4.0 or even 3.5 grade point average ?
I am curious why you are focusing on me rather than on correcting your errors.
My grandmother can go "take classes" so what ?
Perhaps she can teach you something. You should ask her.
Learning something ?? From YOU ??
Viviane - you are WRONG - time and space are NOT the same - hello?
Hello. Yes, you provided the proof of that. Did you not realize you did that?
Why can't you learn instead of stomping ? What is it you think you are "teaching" ??? What are your qualifications ???
Interestingly, I just took 3 classes to learn the latest on astrophysics and cosmology and update my knowledge. With regard to your other questions... please, you just complained about a dick measuring contest and are now trying to start one. In the interest of helping you not complain about your own actions, no. I have no reason to discuss any of that with you.
What actual verifiable education or degrees do you possess???
Does being proven wrong by your own posts sting so much that you want to attack me?
She makes a statement that "time and space are the same thing" and no proof, and you just let that one fly ?
You provided the proof when you wrote e= mc^2. Did you not realize that?
She is dead wrong.
"She" must mean "you" because you provided the proof. Did you not realize that?
And add to that; JW arrogance and need to have all the answers and prove
everyone else wrong and on-up-manship and its a bloody minefield.
Bingo. Not realizing you provided the proof of the thing you are complaining about is a classic example of that. Did you not realize you did that?
Viviane, Read article by Einstein: Nature (Feb. 17, 1921, p 783)
then you can try to prove Einstein wrong.
Prove Einstein wrong? Why in the world do you think that is what I was trying to do?
Why is everything a "competition" here? Or as one board member put it ,
a "dick measuring contest" and I am out of that one since I don't have a dick.
Huh? It's not, as far as I know. If something is wrong, it's wrong. Why do some people get so bent out of shap about learning something?
Time reverses when matter is traveling faster than the speed of light
That is not something that is known to be true.
Space has a "fabric" that curves time around matter, matter and energy distort space time.
Space and time appear to be the same thing, not separate things.
To be clear, there ARE some mathematical models that use multi-dimensional time in an effort to resolve the differences between relativity and quantum physics that are quite interesting. This guy, Gavin Wince, has a history of making stuff up (he once claimed he accurately predicted the Higgs-Boson decay rate years before anyone else yet couldn't show is math or evidence, he also make several basic math errors in every single one of his peices of work. For instance, he's attempting to apply a computational concept known as a k-d binary tree to relativity without explaining how it will work, it just magically does.
So, some basic research would have shown what a crank this guy is.
Anyway I hope you too enjoy some basic research Professor Knowitall Already, from Head In The Sand University
It makes like easy when you declare yourself and opinion irrelevant. Thanks!
I can't even begin to critique this stuff based on my lack of knowledge, but that doesn't stop some "Knowitalls" pronoucing woo on something they have no idea what is being said in the video except their own little narrow idea of what is being taught in physics.
So, because you can't understand it you sling mud at people that are AND assume that you know what their views when you haven't been informed?
Yes, you are ignorant and you declared yourself to be so.
Which BTW I've been given permission to pronouce or denouce as or to put it more sucintly: "Ignorantly call people stupid if I want" by one of JWN's very own resident genius who has also granted himself the very same priviledge in all fairness.
Darling, you never needed permission. At least you recognize and admit you are ignorantly calling people stupid. Recognizing your problem is the first step to fixing it.
It's not just my opinion, Frankie. Some basic research would serve you well.