No, my argument was that there is NO compassion without suffering, which is a fact.
An observable verfiable fact? Citation, please. Please explain how, when I see a puppy at my local no-kill shelter that is fed, played with, given cet care and has toys and a warm place to sleep, I still feel compassion and want to take it home.
Even IF there no compassion without suffering, your argument is self-defeating. If there were no suffering, then there would be absolutely no need for compassion. The thing you say suffering helps us develop is ONLY needed because God allows the suffering his plans caused! You're right back to failing to connect the dots!
That some people choose to NOT be compassionte in the face of suffering does not change the fact that there is no compassion without suffering.
You've still not explained how the lack of compassion after suffering isn't a valid counterpoint.