Viviane

Joined

• started 16 topics
• posted 4,484 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Viviane

• 
  39

  Glory of creation is still untouched!

  by Pinku in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.

  the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.

  [even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Thing is, if energy cannot be created or destroyed then how did all that energy get here in the first place?

  Excellent question. The universe appears to have a net sum of zero energy.
• 
  39

  Glory of creation is still untouched!

  by Pinku in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.

  the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.

  [even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Those touting laws of physics should also consider the law of entropy and the law of cause and effect.

  Reduced down, you said those touting the laws of physics should also consider the laws of physics.

  Not a very good start to the drivel.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  1) Filling the earth with water to top Mt. Everest would have INCREASED gravity AT THAT LEVEL by~ 1/1500 because of the added water weight (came from above) but

  2) The weight of the ark would have been reduced by ~1/400 or 1/4 of 1 percent because of it's greater distance from the CG. so no big deal.

  I would live to see the math and numbers that show increase gravity yet lowers weight. That's a completely contradictory result. I showed my numbers, you show yours.

  3) The lifted atmosphere would have been thinned by 1/480 of its noemal density/pressure. That works out to a pressure drop equivalent to a 20 meter climb, to the roof of an average apartment block. ( based on an ~1% drop in pressure for every 100 m gain in altitude) so

  Please do show that math as well. Earlier you said it would have dropped by 1/1000th, now you are saying (Without realizing it, I think), that at 10000 meters there is no atmosphere. I really truly would love to see how these numbers work.

  talking of temperature/energy the FALL of such an amount of water, or any such mass, (40 with 21 zeros kg). Such lowering from any heights would convert a lot of potential energy into heat. done over only 40 days, you probably would need serious air conditioning, to say the least.

  Please do also show that math. Earlier you thought it was like how the Hoover damn works with the heat, I've not notice any naturally occurring turbines in nature that generate heat. Curious as to how those numbers work.

  Thanks!
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  The rising tide, flood lifts all vessels and the atmosphere.

  sematics are way off topic. period.

  This isn't semantics. Feel free to run away, but you made a lot of claims and now are suddenly, when asking for proof, deciding to run away. Brave brave Sir Robin.

  Of course, you could always step up.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  What I am saying is good enough. research it.

  You contradicted yourself in two sentences. It's not only not good enough, it's not even acceptable in basic ... anything. Don't be lazy and live up to your word. You said you could show math. Put up or shut up.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Bingo, DD.
• 
  3

  Where is the REAL proof that anyone has EVER experienced 'life' after death??

  by NAVYTOWN in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there are countless religions, and have been since prehistoric times.

  most of these religions have included a version of an 'afterlife', of some wonderful place where humans reside after death.

  the bible claims that jesus was 'resurrected' after his death and then 'went to heaven'.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  None.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Vivian you are not reading ideas, If you want to educate yourself on these matters, do your research.

  I don't need to do research to know that claiming mass in the center of a planet is gravitationally neutral. You claimed you could do the math to show it. Please do. Go to Wolfram Alpha or End Memo and calculate the gravitaional attraction of the earth without the core, or without the outer shell, show your work and results. It should be trivially easy. We'll ignore the resulting collapse of the earth should it go missing.

  I showed my math earlier. You should be able to also. Back up your claims rather than lazily saying "research it".

  At the center of a perfect sphere, you would experience no gravitational pull.

  First it was an out shell, then balanced gravity, now no gravity. Clearly and concisely state what you are trying to say using consistent, common terms. You keep changing terms making it hard to figure out what you are saying. For instance, when you say "you", do you mean a human? When you say perfect, do you mean perfect in shape?

  Please be specific.

  There is no gravitational pull any where in the inside of a perfect spherical shell.

  That is clearly and easily demonstrably wrong.

  Gravitational pull is at the maximum outside adjacent to the surface and declines at the inverse of the square of the distance to infinity, but falls in linear (for an idealbody) to zero at the center.

  But you just said there was no gravitaional pull ANYWHERE in the inside. The very next sentence you say something different. Which is it? Please show your work.

  If you dont believe it, please do research, you are in for another surprising learning experience.

  The only thing that surprises me is how often you are wrong, refuse to show referernces and can't read a simple chart.

  You have all of your work ahead of you. You've said you could show math (not done it), mixed and matched terms (need to clearly state what you are trying to say), and contradicted yourself in the space of two sentences.

  Fix that and we can discuss. Saying "research it" is lazy and cheap and you'll get called out on it every time. I showed my work, I even showed I was wrong. You need to step up or step back.
• 
  280

  the flood, mammoths, elphants, and food.

  by Crazyguy in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.

  also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  In the center of the earth there is no gravity, mass is balanced all around it

  Nope. There is absolutely gravity.

  If you start removing matter, without having to worry about pressure, in layer after layer like an onion, hollowed out, the zero, balanced gravity at the center would remain.

  That doesn't even not make sense it's so off.

  To obtain the strength of gravity at ANY point inside the earth, one can ignore all the overlaying mass and just calculate the mass

  How is "overlaying mass" different from "mass"?

  I deliberately did no remove the mistake of having the water canopy's gravity pull up-ward, because in the traditional picture of the world, the earth was flat, the firmament only a half-dome and the water there, lacking the circular shape below the horizon would indeed only pull up.

  And the ancient view of the earth has nothing to do with how gravity works.
• 
  39

  Glory of creation is still untouched!

  by Pinku in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  according to plato, the universe thrives on its own, dies and gets rebornall on its own and within itself.

  the wise symbolized this concept in ouroboros, a serpent eating its own tail.

  [even more wonderful is the marvel called a fruit-bearing treeit does not even eat its own fruit, but simply subsists on mostly what we may consider as dirt/refuse; and trees collectively perform yet another marvel of photosynthesis that make use of our wastes and give us oxygen, food, water, shelter, fiber..........................................[http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/20/opinion/to-save-the-planet-dont-plant-trees.html?_r=0].

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Think of the 20-watts of energy as simply powering a projector.

  Religious drivel with idiotic pseudosceince. Deepak Chopra would be proud.