Viv, i said i was not goimg to talk with you using pms. But please lets keep to the physics.
Ah, well, perhaps I just got overly excited at the idea of your childish rants going away.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Viv, i said i was not goimg to talk with you using pms. But please lets keep to the physics.
Ah, well, perhaps I just got overly excited at the idea of your childish rants going away.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
No viv, you claimed i was wrong in saying the gravitational field of the earth is zero in the center.
If it is not zerO, what is it? you asked me to demonstrate this using math again and again and so i did. If you are not willing to back up your claims you are being a hypocrit. Lol
Actually, that's not what you said. You said there was no gravity. Moving the goalposts again? As predicted, changing your argument. Did you really think no one would notice?
Anyway, you claim there is no gravity. That's cool. Prologos, who you said was right, says gravity can't push. Also cool.
So, with no gravitational field internally and nothing pushing, please explain that big round orange thing in the the sky.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
viv, please explain what you mean. Show the math. What value is the gravitational field?
And now we've arrived at the portion where the only thing you have is copying me. Enjoy.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Oh, and for those of you will inevitably and incorrectly claim there zero gravity in center of a sphere, like the eath, I offer the example of looking to that big bright thing in the sky called the sun. If there is no internal pressure from gravity, explain all those photons stream towards us. Because I like to give people the opportunity to learn, I'll not connect the dots between the photons and gravity for you.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
And again, you called me all sorts of horrible names and said you weren't going to talk to me again. Why are you still here? DO you feel you cansomehow make up those 8 points you lack? Are you attempting to learn more about physics?
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Bohm: meanwhile, in a textbook on relativity and cosmology: "the gravitational field inside a spherical homogeneous shell of matter is always zero."
Yep, that's exactly right. As predicted, you are moving your arguments, as you learn, to say exactly what I was.
...because the full system contain a preasure gradient balanced by gravity. Gravity scale linearly by the distance from the center inside the earth as i already showed lol
So there id gravity. Exactly as I said. As predicted, you are now still complaining while agreeing with everything I said.
lol too funny. Actually i was >90th percentile and it helped me get into a phd program lol.
90th? Wow. That's impressive. 8 points behind where I tested, but still, you're a smart person.
Put up or shut up please. answer my above questions with something else than insults and tantrums
And thus begins the portion of the conversation where you pretend like you're not now saying what I was and that you weren't the first person to starting insulting people. No one has called you names. You're the only person to have pitched a tantrum liked a child in this conversation.
As I said, being 8 points behind me and getting a degree in physics did nothing for your personality or morals.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
There is a lot of pressure at the very center of the Earth, no gravity.
Wrong. Show your math. If it was all pressure, why isn't it exploding?Did I mention wrong? If not, wrong. In case you didn't get that (and you expect wrongway bohm to prop you wiht his basic and fundamental misunderstanding of physics), wrong wrong wrong and wrong.
Bohm's physics degreee, or at least his understaning of it, seems to be whatever he just read on wikipedia. Sad, really.
Oh, and a very quick google search revealed the wesbsite you lifted the math you claimed as you own from. That's just really reallyl sad.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
meanwhile, in a textbook on relativity and cosmology: "the gravitational field inside a spherical homogeneous shell of matter is always zero."
Meanwile, selective quoting is always the tool of the weak, wrong and foolish.
You can try again, your cheap methods will always be exposed. Seriously, though, for a grown man who claim he was done being proven wrong over and over and over, you keep coming back for more. Why? Your physics degee is worth less than the paper you wipe your arse with given your complete and apparent lack of understanding of basic physics.
Was it a special edication class? That might explain a lot.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Anyway, i'm off to a beer festival. Have a great day trying to figure some way, any way you could hope to outwit me.
my question is since it looks as though mammoths were alive after the flood and we know elephants are then how much food was needed to feed just these four animals for the time they were on the ark.
also was the ark, 500 feet long, big enough to hold the amount of food needed for just these 4 animals.. .
.
Partly right, bohm. Radioactive decay is part of it.Utterly wrong on the gravity, though.
With respect to moving the goalposts, you totally did. The funny part is that's what you were trying (and failing, of course) to accuse me of.
For someone that said you were done with me, you seem yo love the attention. You're word isn't very good.