I am a senior engineer with a large engineering firm
I'm curious, what type of engineering scale do you carry in your pocket for when you need to measure how much money you have?
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
I am a senior engineer with a large engineering firm
I'm curious, what type of engineering scale do you carry in your pocket for when you need to measure how much money you have?
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
Would your illustration be before or after that creation would have sinned to go from vegetation to meat.
You've zero proof that happened.
To have teeth for foraging and digging to preservation. The bible states vegetation, however you seem to imply a marvel of modern science to know implicitly. Did you build a time machine? So then, your point being!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you wish to continue, the forum is yours, I find your argument redundant at this point
Poor logic aside, you are simply making things up that is contradictory to all evidence to preserve the notion that your death cult blood god is worthy of fealty.
“We concluded that Josephoartigasia must have used its incisors for activities other than biting, such as digging in the ground for food, or defending itself from predators," Dr. Philip Cox, a professor of physiology at the University of York and Hull York Medical School in England, who led the research, said in a written statement.
You don't get to reject science when it proves your blood cult death god isn't real and then try to ride it like a temple concubine when you mistakenly think it helps your case.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
That would be incorrect,Viviane. I was just responding to Cofty's assumption: This is what happens when you feel free to make stuff up on the spot with no knowledge of your subject and no respect for facts.
So then the assertion of defending Cofty would draw the parallels on what you just mentioned.
Yes, you're responding, by making stuff up, some of it about teeth and others about Cofty. You're not respecting the facts or the limits of your own knowledge and certainly not other people.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
To call someone ignorant you must first study your own fallacies. Without it, your discussion becomes meaningless.
So, you're making an assumption that Cofty hasn't studied himself? Since you have know way of knowing that, wouldn't making such an assertion be an ignorant position to take?
With the hypothetical illustration of the dinosaurs sharp teeth. Science conforms that early dinosaurs had even sharp teeth. Your confusion starts as the animal kingdom developed let’s say fangs.
Full stop. Are you defining "sharp teeth" as fangs? If so, why? If not, why? Sharp molars? Teeth that broke? Molars ground by years of plant eating? All can be sharp, you've made no distinction, you need to be more clear on exactly what you are saying.
If that life cycle was created and turned into carnivore, it would explain the obvious, the animal kingdom adapted. Now you can include suffering, but not before.
The animal kingdom, prior to the existence of man had predation, disease, and painful death by other unfortunate circumstances. Animals suffered. If you assert an all loving god as the source of existence, you've still not explained suffering prior to mythical sin.
lets look at their meanings.
the hebrew aleph is the same as our a but our a dose not have a symbol attached to it.
interestingly the aleph is silent.
Look at the first letter of Arthur Fonzarelli's name. It's an A. Alpha, the beginning. Fonzie is the beginning, god. How do we know this? His name, Arthur, rhymes with "author", the source. The Fonz says "eeeehhhhhh!" and things happen when he. He speaks (logos) and things happen. He is the author of existence. He makes things happen merely by his logos. He has a holy chariot, his motorcycle. He is surrounded by beautiful women, virgins and temple concubines alike. His be friend is Richie Cunningham, clearly a message from the author that he wants us to be rich, cunning as a serpent and to enjoy ham. He often solves the problems of those who remain close to him. He wants to help us.
This is so obvious to anyone who wants to put the time in to learn it.
Lest you think this post has jumped the shark, I remind you that the Fonz literally jumped a shark while wearing a leather jacket, something no human can do, thus proving his divinity.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
'Does not make my money grow' is referring to his oh-so-clever story, he means that reality is as it is, nobody's views, opinions, or comments can change that.
Except the story isn't clever at all. It's ridiculous.
He clearly enjoys flaunting his intelligience and education by means of word play etc. far more than trying to help those without a great deal of education and busy people (such as most JW's who lurk here sometimes), to think about a subject.
Except you can't flaunt what you don't have.
"Seconds of terror possibly painless,-- to pay for years of joy? a fair bargain."
That's not actually a bargain, though. It's seconds or minutes or hours of terror with immense pain followed by death.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
How simple it sounds when logic is exercised to obscure sound research. The assertion that a heavenly creator would purposely subject its creation to pain is overreaching.
The Bible, your holy, book, literally says that God does that. Don't pretend it doesn't, that would be a hilariously obvious lie.
To a theist, why does God allow Suffering? God didn’t, that came about by man’s own sins.
Wrong. Animals suffered long before man existed. Therefore God caused suffering. Why don't theists know their own holy book?
However it doesn’t explain if a creator that made the dinosaur created those big teeth to shred, let’s say heavy or thick vegetation.
It explains it quite well! Why don't theists ever actually know facts, history or their own holy book?
So to have a rational argument or irrational conversation is moot. That’s the purpose of Noah. Believe or not, the choice is your own.
Yours is clear to ignore reality is favor of irrationality.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
Support your view (against Anselm's)
A god that doesn't cause his own creation to suffer is greater than the god of the bible.
Done. Ontological view is down for a permanent nap.
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
Support your view.
Cofty, I got this...
Support is here.... http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/users/11814/Fisherman/posted
..specifically, the suffering of animals.
you can talk about free will/sin/people choosing to not listen to god etc to explain human suffering being allowed.. but how can you love a god that allows animals, that haven't sinned or chosen to not have anything to do with god, to have their short lives ended in often long, drawn out, painful ways.
i could list stories i've read that would probably make you feel ill, but i'm not looking to shock anyone or start an emotional debate.
LOL Obviously, not. What do you think? I did not say count. I said measured. I meant count.
Which kind of engineer's scale counts money rather than measures it? I only ask because so far your story is not adding up and, rather than assume you are making it up, I want you to have the opportunity to correct it.
You've already had multiple opportunities, it needs to make sense now or it looks like you are making up a whole lot of things.
My story was meant to illustrate the difference between knowing with certainty and believing something.
Exactly. So far everyone knows your story is completely not making sense and no one believes it. You need to fix that.
When I used the terms, engineer's scale, instrument, "a reading" , ruler, measurement and multiple measurements in my story, I was alluding to scientific fact in connection with something that I know with certainty versus something that I only believe in.
So...are you making this up or not? If so, it's a horrible story that illustrates you don't know anything about money, counting, measuring or science. If not... well, it shows the same thing.
I was also fishing for anyone who has ever written a lab report above the grade 12, who I thought would "almost immediately" recognize these terms and could understand what I meant.
So far it's not clear that you know what you mean.
I was also fishing for anyone that ever took the LSAT, who I thought would be able to decipher my very simple story. All I did was to express count in terms of measuring.
I've taken the LSAT and scored above 98%. I still wouldn't use and engineer's scale (whatever that is) to count money, no more than I would use a ruler to weigh a melon. Your story is sounding more and more like you made something up and are trying to make it sound clever, but are only succeeding in proving you don't nor did have any idea what you are on about.
Commentaries, ridicule, remarks,. beliefs do not make my money grow if you know what I mean.
No, no one does. Use English and complete sentences and then we might.
Can anyone show from the Bible why a compassionate God would cause pain and suffering to any living creature prior to sin? That was the dialogue I was having with Caece, not "perhaps"
No, no one can. Hence, you worship a bloodthirsty death God who, oh ho ho ho, also happens to enjoy the pensis of baby boys and raping virgins.