I think this is the only and first comment of yours I've ever liked and laughed at haha. Nice find.
No one is perfect.
sickening to see the photo of the religious zealots all stood around the governor signing into law the right for people to discriminate against others (gay, lesbian, trans-gender) based purely on religious dogma.. if religious people want those freedoms then the can't have it both ways - they cannot complain if *they* are discriminated against.. "sorry, we don't like zionists, get out".
"oh, it's some special mass and you can't work your shift?
you're fired!"..
I think this is the only and first comment of yours I've ever liked and laughed at haha. Nice find.
No one is perfect.
why didn't jesus ever write anything?
why are there no letters to jesus?
no painting of jesus from that time?
Not talking about Jesus? Who is the man he says they worship? Who is the distinguished personage who introducted their rites and was crucified? Who was their original lawgiver?
Just because I mock Juggalos doesn't mean I've once mentioned ICP. Similarly, that text mocks Christians and doesn't say Jesus once.
He said, "Their Wise King". Not "a" Wise King. The sign on Jesus cross said, "King of the Jews". Tell me another historical figure that non Jews place among names such as Socrates that the Jews had crucified and could be considered a wise king?
First, he never said "crucified", so attempting to associate "crucified" with "executed" is disingenuous at best. Secondly, Jesus was crucified by the Romans, not Jews. Third, he NEVER mentions Jesus. You saying he does is completely untrue.
why didn't jesus ever write anything?
why are there no letters to jesus?
no painting of jesus from that time?
Really? Which of the jews wise king did they murder then?
Really. He never says which one he is thinking of.
What did the sign post on Jesus cross say? John 19:19 if you forgot.
It certainly doesn't say "Wise King". Jesus never WAS king, in any event.
Mara Bar-Serapion refers to Jesus as the “Wise King”:
He refers to A wise king but never names him or otherwise indicates he in talking about Jesus. Your claim is 100% untrue.
why didn't jesus ever write anything?
why are there no letters to jesus?
no painting of jesus from that time?
The Babylonian Talmud 43a IS talking about the Jesus of the bible. Remember the Pharasees accused him of in Matt 12:24-27?
I didn't it wasn't talking about the same guy, I said it doesn't describe him. For instance, it says he had five disciples, contrary to the Bible. It says he was stoned and then hung, contrary to the Bible. It says he was held while they called for witnesses and waited forty days, contrary to the Bible. The names of his disciples are not those found the Bible. He was killed by the Sanhedrin, not the Romans, contrary to the Bible. He was killed for religious crimes, not the the crime of sedition as recorded in the Bible.
So, the ONLY similarities are Jesus, Jewish and some disciples. More details, major details, differ than agree. Maybe it is talking about the same man, but it is certainly largely disagreeing with the Bible on most major points.
As I said, it's describing something wholly different from Biblical Jesus.
Same for 107b, these sources are showing how those who killed Jesus viewed him. Now what you must ask yourself is why aren't they denying such a man ever existed?
107b describes a Jesus that was a disciple of Jesus b. Perachiah, was sent away for mis-translating a text and for thinking about a woman too much and who later turned to idolatry, worshiping fish.
That's not the Jesus of the Bible by any means.
Here are more...
If you are going to steal from Wikipedia, at least have the decency to credit them.
- Jesus as the son of Mary (Shab 104b, Sanh 67a)
I am not going to address the entire list, but this one is laughable. There is nothing in the Talmud that says Jesus mother is Mary. It DOES mention someone NOT Joseph as his father and somewhere else mention Mary is that man's lover. That's it.
there seem to be many prerequisites for life as we know it.. to name a few: order, function, compatibility, availability, sustainability, intelligence, consciousness, intuition and so on.. focusing on only one, namely order.. what are the chances of order arising spontaneously, by chance, with no creator/designer?.
i have often pondered this and recently came across a mathematical summary of the big picture:.
if every particle in the known physical universe (10^80 particles), participated in one trillion interactions (10^12 interactions) per second, for the entire 30 billion years of the universe's existence (10^18 seconds), then we would by now have covered only 10^110 permutations.. if you had only 100 components in a container, what are the chances that a blindfolded person could lay them out in order on a table?.
How about time being the radius dimension through which the balloon membrane we live in expands? In our formulae, graphs, tme is always at right angles, -normal- to the space dimension. With time a given, the dimension dilemma becomes manageable.
Time and space are the same thing so... no.
why didn't jesus ever write anything?
why are there no letters to jesus?
no painting of jesus from that time?
Babylonian Talmud 43a
That doesn't describe the Jesus of the Bible.
Sanhedrin 107b
Sanhedrin 107b has this to say of Jesus, "Sanhedrin 107[70] tells of a Jesus ("Yeshu") "offended his teacher by paying too much attention to the inn-keeper's wife. Jesus wished to be forgiven, but [his rabbi] was too slow to forgive him, and Jesus in despair went away and put up a brick [idol] and worshipped it.""
Jesus leering at an innkeepers wife and then practicing idolatry? You sure that's the Jesus of the Bible?
“On the whole world there pressed a most fearful darkness; and the rocks were rent by an earthquake, and many places in Judea and other districts were thrown down. This darkness Thallus, in the third book of his History, calls, as appears to me without reason, an eclipse of the sun.” (Julius Africanus, Chronography, 18:1)
That's talking about an earthquake and eclipse, not Jesus.
In his “Annals’ of 116AD, he describes Emperor Nero’s response to the great fire in Rome and Nero’s claim that the Christians were to blame:
Talking about Christians, not Jesus.
Mara Bar-Serapion
He never mentioned Jesus.
Lucian was a Greek satirist who spoke sarcastically of Christ and Christians
Mocking Christians...not talking about Jesus.
Josephus writes about Jesus in his “the Antiquities of the Jews” in 93AD.
That is know to have been at LEAST altered and only MAY have been an actual expansion of something he could have actually written.
why didn't jesus ever write anything?
why are there no letters to jesus?
no painting of jesus from that time?
sickening to see the photo of the religious zealots all stood around the governor signing into law the right for people to discriminate against others (gay, lesbian, trans-gender) based purely on religious dogma.. if religious people want those freedoms then the can't have it both ways - they cannot complain if *they* are discriminated against.. "sorry, we don't like zionists, get out".
"oh, it's some special mass and you can't work your shift?
you're fired!"..
sickening to see the photo of the religious zealots all stood around the governor signing into law the right for people to discriminate against others (gay, lesbian, trans-gender) based purely on religious dogma.. if religious people want those freedoms then the can't have it both ways - they cannot complain if *they* are discriminated against.. "sorry, we don't like zionists, get out".
"oh, it's some special mass and you can't work your shift?
you're fired!"..
there seem to be many prerequisites for life as we know it.. to name a few: order, function, compatibility, availability, sustainability, intelligence, consciousness, intuition and so on.. focusing on only one, namely order.. what are the chances of order arising spontaneously, by chance, with no creator/designer?.
i have often pondered this and recently came across a mathematical summary of the big picture:.
if every particle in the known physical universe (10^80 particles), participated in one trillion interactions (10^12 interactions) per second, for the entire 30 billion years of the universe's existence (10^18 seconds), then we would by now have covered only 10^110 permutations.. if you had only 100 components in a container, what are the chances that a blindfolded person could lay them out in order on a table?.
You know, I really don't typically like your posts.
I know.
But this is damn hilarious. I can't stop laughing.
It is. If you like that, then this one will really crack you up with the level of derpitude.
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/kondrich/141017