my pleasure. I'm not a fan of inerrancy and can only claim plausibility for my pov
Your claim is incorrect and utterly implausible.
hello, i am certainly new to all of this.
i have recently been studying the prophecy's, and i was wondering if they are of any importance at all?
my pleasure. I'm not a fan of inerrancy and can only claim plausibility for my pov
Your claim is incorrect and utterly implausible.
i see an attitude among some people here which is not very helpful.
i can understand it, but still, it's not constructive or helpful.. if you condemn the society for not changing, but then you also condemn them when they do change in a positive way, what incentive or motive does that provide for the people at the society to ever want to change for the better?.
also, what does that attitude look like to current witnesses who are having doubts?.
If you condemn the Society for NOT changing, but then you also condemn them when they DO change in a positive way, what incentive or motive does that provide for the people at the Society to ever want to change for the better?
First, you make an error of omission, specifically not explaining what is better. How is the new better than the old? What metric are you using to make that claim and how is it objectively verifiable to others? How does it substantially change the life of Jehovah's Witnesses and their families for the better?
Also, what does that attitude look like to current Witnesses who are having doubts?
It probably looks to them like the Society has been correct in the way they describe apostates as bitter complainers who are never happy with anything the Society does.
This is the fallacy of presumption combined with a strawman. You provide no reason for making the presumption of how other people would view things. You provide no evidence for it and proceed to set an argument that you can easily knock down while attempting to make it look as if you are addressing a real issue.
And when they recently have admitted to errors and say they've been wrong in big ways in the past, some accuse them of having some secret conspiracy theory motive behind it.
To the people with this attitude: What exactly is it that you WANT the Society to do?
This is the only real meat in your post. You finally address the issue, but not for the reasons it needs to be addressed.
The reason it needs to be addressed is that they advertise they have the truth. They advertise that God gives it to them. When they make predictions and claims because they commune with God and then reverse those claims and predictions, it creates a very real issue with credibility. Was God lying to them? Were they talking to someone other than God? Were they making it up?
These questions are all important because they are just making claims about the future, they are using the justification of talking to God that affects people lives, their family, their financial status, their social status. It's important because if anyone publicly disagrees with these predicitions and rule and, often quite correctly, points out the lack of Biblical support or outright disagreement them, heavy sanctions are applied that can, quite literally, ruin a persons life.
So, rather than avoid the actual issue and use fallacies to do it, perhaps you would be better served by meditation upon the deep things, partaking of the meat rather than the milk.
recently there have been several claims made regarding prophecies that came true.
i've not personally seen a prophecy that i would consider as having come true.
i would consider the following as the requirements to say something is a prophecy and evaluate whether or not it came true:.
You are in agreement with the WT on that.
A lot of Christians, not just the WT, say that. They want to have their cake and eat it, too.
recently there have been several claims made regarding prophecies that came true.
i've not personally seen a prophecy that i would consider as having come true.
i would consider the following as the requirements to say something is a prophecy and evaluate whether or not it came true:.
I guess the argument would come down to "what constitutes a prophecy?"
If someone needs dates and names, there's not much, if anything, that will fit.
The looser the criteria for a prophecy, the more will be found.
Not much of a prophecy then, if there is no way to tell what's going to happen, is it?
recently there have been several claims made regarding prophecies that came true.
i've not personally seen a prophecy that i would consider as having come true.
i would consider the following as the requirements to say something is a prophecy and evaluate whether or not it came true:.
recently there have been several claims made regarding prophecies that came true.
i've not personally seen a prophecy that i would consider as having come true.
i would consider the following as the requirements to say something is a prophecy and evaluate whether or not it came true:.
According to Old Testament law, anyone caught selling another person into slavery was to be executed
Bullshit. Fathers could sell their children into slavery, they could buy and sell foreigners and slaves could be beaten brutally as long as they didn't die within a day or two.
I have to admit, either you are the biggest liar/idiot about the Bible I have ever seen or the most magnificent troll.
At first glance, it would appear as if God is condoning the beating of the slave, but let's read this carefully. First, we see that this verse in no way CONDONES beating a slave.
Bullshit. If God says they can do it, that's condoning it. Don't waffle, be worm, trying to squirm out of this. Glory, back, glow with pride the violence your God wished and brought to the people.
So, obviously, slavery during Old Testament times was not what we commonly recognize as slavery, such as that practiced in the 17th century Americas, when Africans were captured and forcibly brought to work on plantations.
Bullshit. They captured slaves in war and routinely bought and sold them, beat them, had sex with them. Be glorious is the power your god exercised of people. Don't shrink from it like a wilting flower.
So, although there are rules about slavery in the Bible, those rules exist to protect the slave.
You know what would protect them more? NOT ALLOWING SLAVERY.
You are a sickening Christian. You defend the god of the OT, trying to lie and weasel out of his gross crimes and horrible things. Sure, there was slavery, but it wasn't like slavery slavery. And rape was, you know, rape, not like rape rape. You excuse God for every bad thing he did while trying to pretend that somehow it was love. Murder. Rape. Genocide. Abortion. That's what you call love.
You worship and defend a capricious, petty, moral monster who would be guilty of warcrimes were he an actual person. Own that. You want the good part you think come with God, you are sure as hell going to get the bad.
It's past my bedtime.
Past mine, too. Sleep tight, faux lover.
Viviane + Village Idiot
I really hope I am the devil in that picture, buddy. Otherwise, your penis tail is tickling my unmentionables and I don't have a prostate to play with.
BTW Village idiot. I was talking to Viviane.
Village Idiot and I are lovers committing adultery every night and just about every nine months murdering my unborn child while stealing and working to do it on the sabbath while bearing false witness about the entire situation and worshiping a pentagram idol made by our parents we sold into slavery to our neighbors that worship other gods and then we lie about why we need so many pentagrams, mainly so we can take the lords name in vain while committing the adultery that leads to the murder, etc., etc.. Also, we really like Baphomet more than YHWH, just to get the first commandment in this fiction.
It's a vicious cycle.