viv, thats a pretty good description of your own tactics. you and cofty - both of you doing the same thing
And now you're doing PeeWee Herman to attempt to pretend others are guilty of your shortcomings.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv, thats a pretty good description of your own tactics. you and cofty - both of you doing the same thing
And now you're doing PeeWee Herman to attempt to pretend others are guilty of your shortcomings.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
the evidence is in front of you - all you need to do is listen for two or three minutes.
do you even know what Dawkins says about memes?
OK, you've got nothing. You can't or won't back up your claims and now you're attempting to insinuate that I am somehow at fault.
It's a typical tactic, a sad and laughable tactic and one I am sad to see you turn to.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv; it is only a few minutes long - check it yourself
Don't be ridiculous. You made a claim, provide the evidence. Otherwise, why are you talking?
dawkins did not just coin the word meme. furthermore he ties memes to religion - so yes it does matter how much time spends doing science
Specifically, why does his time spent on science have anything to do with memes on religion? Tie the two things together with a cogent, reasoned argument that shows direct cause and effect. Otherwise, you've done nothing but make an empty claim.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
viv, in the recording Richard Dawkins does say what FT says he says.
Then please provide the time stamp and quote.
as I said in a previous post Dawkins empowers memes to such an extent that he gives them agency. I think this possibly stems from spending so much time study the natural histories of organsims.
Dawkins coined the word meme and how must time he spends doing science has nothing to do with is in particular.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
I hope you'll find most atheists just believe in one less god than the average deist.
There have been at least 30000 gods, deities, goddesses, etc., throughout history. Christians simply 0.000033% less atheist than we are.
last night a young man in a bar struck up a conversation with me.
our town is having our pride parade soon and he brought it up, the bible and how it's against the bible.
me being me, i said that i couldn't care less that it was against the bible and that it was a horrible guide for morality anyway.
You're a strange one Viv
Thank you.
The only strange thing is that are not more Vivs.
The World would be a far better place if there were.
Thank you, Phizzy.
Viviane this experience will surely make it to this years apostate Year Book... Praise Zeus!
Penthouse Letters at the very least, I hope!
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
The main point of me posting this is to show that incredibly intelligent scientists say that the existence of some kind of intelligent life-giver and designer is possible.
Let's deal first, with claims you've made and wrote in the OP vs. what you are now saying that is different.
You said you added no commentary. Are you denying that you wrote these words? Richard Dawkins admitted that information inside of DNA, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
This refutes those atheists who say anyone who believes in a Creator is STUPID or an IDIOT.
Well, first let's make sure we all know what you wrote and said. What you claim doesn't appear to be factual and we all already know that you've a habit of making false claims. Let's get you on solid ground first regarding what you said and did before we move on to attempting to draw conclusions about those things.
richard dawkins admitted that information inside of dna, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
(see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=boncjbrrdq8 )richard dawkins further admitted, in a debate with francis collins for time magazine, that science might point to a creator existing, but that this creator might not be anything like yahweh:.
time: "could the answer be god?
That's precisely why I didn't add any commentary
So you didn't write the words I am about to quote? Words, I might add, which are NOT what he said?
Richard Dawkins admitted that information inside of DNA, and the origin of life on earth, might point to intelligent designers, perhaps extraterrestrials.
Those aren't your words?
last night a young man in a bar struck up a conversation with me.
our town is having our pride parade soon and he brought it up, the bible and how it's against the bible.
me being me, i said that i couldn't care less that it was against the bible and that it was a horrible guide for morality anyway.
last night a young man in a bar struck up a conversation with me.
our town is having our pride parade soon and he brought it up, the bible and how it's against the bible.
me being me, i said that i couldn't care less that it was against the bible and that it was a horrible guide for morality anyway.
I'm searching this thread from top to bottom and don't see anywhere a scripture was quoted at all.
Proverbs 5:19 - Let her breasts satisfy you always.
Ask and you shall receive.