I was not aware you used two atheist definitions, whats the different between them? Which one do you use on a baby and which one do you use on a plant?
I didn't use two. Ever. Try and keep up, dear.
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
Dionysus the god of wine is the one true god,
I'm more of a "very expensive Scotch" kind of gal. Is there a god for that?
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
Then babies cant be atheist either since the claim is that they are atheists because they cant conceive of the notion. Hence, "don't believe anything".
That was never my argument at all. That's the argument you keep trying (and failing, BTW) to CLAIM I am making. Stop making things up, or at the very least try to start understanding the words on the screen that I am writing.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
Either they don't lack a belief in God OR, you are saying that plants are Atheists...
Plants are atheist by necessity since they lack even the ability to have and belief in god and thus the belief itself. That has nothing to do with babies, rocks, poop, magical unicorns in my dogs butt or your butchering logic.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
You can be meaner? Yet you take every opportunity to insult me...
In fact, I've never insulted you. You appear to have personal feelings tied to your argument, thus, when your argument is shown to be poor and damaged, that affects your emotions. That's not me insulting you in any way nor being the least bit mean to you.
Since you are unable to defend this point, I conclude that babies are not Atheists. Because that is what the argumentwas about.
On the contrary, your question was logically invalid, thus any conclusion based on it is necessarily wrong. I mean, you agreed that your question was logically unsound. What in the world makes you think that because it's unsound you can draw conclusions on it.
It shows that you indeed can know whether or not you know something without having thought about it.
This is just more proof that you are using the opposite of logic, arguments and words in any way that makes sense.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
So which is it? Are plants Atheists or may they not lack a belief in God?
Dude, you are off the rails on this. I've no idea what point you are trying to make or how you are trying to connect them. Certainly, attempting to force a logically exclusive operator into a question to me regarding something I've never claimed had to be one or the other regarding classes of items that have abilities that render the entire question the mental equivalent utterly pointless act of punching yourself in the balls and asking me why I am hurting your.
In other words, you're attempting to conflate a class of item, plants and dogs, that do not and never can have the ability to have a belief in god (and therefore by necessity must lack it) with a class of items that don't have it at a given time, specifically babies, but will, in most cases, develop that ability.
In short, your question is dumb.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
That is just a nice way of excusing deliberately misunderstanding my arguments...
I can be meaner about pointing out where you are conflating words, improperly using logic and failing to construct a valid argument, if you're into that sort of thing.
I'm in no way misunderstanding them, they're just.. bad arguments. Incorrect use of words. Crappy logic. Your problem, not mine.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
Yes you can't pic it.
Alright then, so your question made no sense and was logically invalid. Case closed.
Can you conceive of a thing youdon't [sic] know?
Of course. How many teeth the average t-rex had at any given stage of it's life. We've already covered this.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
well i assume she is hot, I am a viv is hot agnostic.
I do alright for myself... :*
I am very proud of myself
I've always been very proud of you.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
The context was that I gave an example of a way of measuring that had not previously been used in that way and area. If mathematics had suggested that before was and is irrelevant in the context.
Connect the dots. Why? They went looking to measure something based on having a reason to believe it existed. How in the world is that irrelevant? You have to show why it is irrelevant in order to make that claim. Your say so isn't good enough.
No, not out of context.
And you've failed to show why mathematical models in science it out of context. You've all your work ahead of you.