Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
And learn how to use logic and construct an argument next time, will ya? -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
I know you would prefer it that way. Maybe you are arguing so strongly for it, because you are identifying with it yourself.
Weak attempts to play the PeeWee Herman card are the most obvious, lame and weak attempts to pretend you're not being exactly as butthurt as you are.
-
49
I sent this to Angus Stewart this morning (Easter Standard Time)
by Viviane ini just sent this email to angus stewart:.
i hope this email finds you well.
i would like to say thank you for your work on the royal commission, particularly in your handling of the jehovah's witnesses elders and experts during questioning.
-
Viviane
Thanks! -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
This shit would not fly in a formal debate, or maybe it would, those are usually about saving face...
Oh yeah, agreed, the logic you tried to use would have been laughed out of the room immediately.
I don't know if you learned anything, you seem too arrogant. Maybe you should read up on the tings you like to think you have schooled me.
Or, translated "I'm going to blame your for my butthurt".
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
Your logic is crappy is not an insult?
So, your brain is stupid. Is not an insult?
Or, your face is ugly?
Your inability to use your brain? -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
Your logic is crappy is not an insult?
So, your brain is stupid. Is not an insult?
Or, your face is ugly?
Your inability to use your brain?Apparently not, as you are entering them in as facts or record, it seems. (that was written in my head as if Angus Stewart were saying it). Plus, we already dealt with that. Asked and answered. Try and keep up.
Also, we've moved on. Try and keep up. It's about sangria, my friend and our legs, and high fiving Angus Stewarts naughty bits with our naughty bits (that last part may be new)
-
49
I sent this to Angus Stewart this morning (Easter Standard Time)
by Viviane ini just sent this email to angus stewart:.
i hope this email finds you well.
i would like to say thank you for your work on the royal commission, particularly in your handling of the jehovah's witnesses elders and experts during questioning.
-
Viviane
I don't think there is, but in my line of work I often deal with financial regulatory rules and government agencies, sometimes there are really weird rules about what they can accept, what constitutes a gift, etc.. I just felt it would better to ask and make my intentions clear up front. I did leave out the part about him being so hot during the proceedings it made me want to high five his private bits with mine, though. -
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
Viviane
I will give you 36 hours to stop that. I mean it.
She's moved her foot back on top of my legs and we've ordered a pizza since we're too lazy and sangria'ed to go get food.
-
49
I sent this to Angus Stewart this morning (Easter Standard Time)
by Viviane ini just sent this email to angus stewart:.
i hope this email finds you well.
i would like to say thank you for your work on the royal commission, particularly in your handling of the jehovah's witnesses elders and experts during questioning.
-
Viviane
I just sent this email to Angus Stewart:
Mr. Stewart,
I hope this email finds you well. I would like to say thank you for your work on the Royal Commission, particularly in your handling of the Jehovah's Witnesses elders and experts during questioning. Your skill and preparedness is evident and it makes me quite happy (as a former JW myself) to see the light being cast upon their handling of crimes in secret meetings and the utter disregard they have for the victims.I have been watching the delayed Youtube videos of the commission (delayed as I am in the U.S. and you are conducting the proceedings while I am sleeping) and find them quite exciting and educational to watch. I particularly love the depth of work you have put into learning about their policies, past and present, and tie those back to the notes and actions of the elders and branch, which brings us to the point of my email.I was giving a friend a re-cap of the events (as she was never a JW, she prefers a re-cap to the excitement of watching all of the proceedings) and said I should send you a nice bottle of Scotch as a thank you for your amazing work. She correctly pointed out that I've no idea if you drink Scotch. Hence, in the interest of not saying thank you in a useless way, do you drink Scotch?I hope that is not out of line nor would potentially violate any ethics rules you may be bound by.Thanks,XXX