I could listen to Angus Stewart tear these guys a new one all day, is there an email address people can email him...if there is I presume he is getting inundated but I personally want to thank him.
How about a thread?
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
81
Did you hear that!? His Honour is insisting that Jackson attend the Royal Commission
by umbertoecho ini actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".
it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.
this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!
-
-
Viviane
-
30
We can now estimate the absolute minimum number of child abuse cases
by Viviane invincent tool said that he is exclusively working the phones for child abuse cases, but never said he is not the only one.
for now, let's assume the rate of abuse cases averages over time to the three or four cases he gets per month.
let's further assume that, since he isn't the only person working the phones and is on vacation at some point, the number is 4-5 per month, or 4.5 per month.
-
-
Viviane
True on the varying number of JWs.
Also, prior to the instructions to call the service department, we lack any way to know how many calls or cases wen't completely undealt with. It's absolutely higher, by far, than the 1006 cases over 60 years.
Also, Angus produced a letter from the branch to the GB mentioning the list of names! The list is confirmed to exist!
-
30
We can now estimate the absolute minimum number of child abuse cases
by Viviane invincent tool said that he is exclusively working the phones for child abuse cases, but never said he is not the only one.
for now, let's assume the rate of abuse cases averages over time to the three or four cases he gets per month.
let's further assume that, since he isn't the only person working the phones and is on vacation at some point, the number is 4-5 per month, or 4.5 per month.
-
-
Viviane
Vincent tool said that he is exclusively working the phones for child abuse cases, but never said he is not the only one. For now, Let's assume the rate of abuse cases averages over time to the three or four cases he gets per month. Let's further assume that, since he isn't the only person working the phones and is on vacation at some point, the number is 4-5 per month, or 4.5 per month. Over the past 60 year, that works out to ....
...3240.
Or more than 3 times the amount we know about.
In Australia alone.
Think about that.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
By any possible standard, not to mention that you are breaking forum rules, exposing your children to the things you posted on the previous page is abusive by any possible standard.
Oh, it's nothing compared to your poop stain's stuff. Child rape, genocide, murder, slavery.... what I posted, namely the words fuck and shit, aren't even a poop nugget in the mountain of explosive shit your poop stain did.
Stop being dramatic.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
You have shown ample evidence to the contrary.
-
21
where there was a conflict between the Bible and science, the Bible would prevail, because all scripture is "inspired by God"
by freemindfade inthought i would put this in its own thread.
it another embarrassing statement from the rc (royal commission not regional convention lol).
it's not even one about abuse, its about the jw's stance on science and the bible.
-
-
Viviane
Really? They tried to pull the Hitler card? Really? -
49
I sent this to Angus Stewart this morning (Easter Standard Time)
by Viviane ini just sent this email to angus stewart:.
i hope this email finds you well.
i would like to say thank you for your work on the royal commission, particularly in your handling of the jehovah's witnesses elders and experts during questioning.
-
-
Viviane
Toes Up, great letter. I went a slightly different route.... My response:
Thank you for your reply, Mr. Stewart. That was an angle I had not considered, that some people may be wishing you harm and it's a good one to keep in mind.
I do know that you understand that, for many people who have dealt with these issues, for decades there was no hope of justice, no hope of recompense. It is a bit of hyperbole, but not not much, I think, to suggest that you are Obi Wan and Superman rolled into one for those victims, their only hope and and the one that can defeat the super villain. I'm not attempting dramatics, but there are thousands and thousands of victims, their friends and families following this with amazement, wonder and joy that someone is finally breaking through the wall of secrecy and bringing as least the hope of justice.So, I wasn't planning on personally shipping you a bottle, but rather ordering a bottle from someone like the Whisky Exchange and having them package and ship it. Alternatively, they also do gift certificates. I probably should have made that more clear, but either way. I am looking forward to watching today's proceedings.
Good luck and godspeed, Mr. Stewart.
Thanks,XXXX -
49
I sent this to Angus Stewart this morning (Easter Standard Time)
by Viviane ini just sent this email to angus stewart:.
i hope this email finds you well.
i would like to say thank you for your work on the royal commission, particularly in your handling of the jehovah's witnesses elders and experts during questioning.
-
-
Viviane
Here is the response I received. So... an online gift certificate emailed to him for a Scotch seller online would probably work, I am going to ask him :)
Thank you XXXX for your interest and support. Thank you also for the offer of a bottle of Scotch. I must say that your mail is more than adequate thanks and even if you were to send me a bottle I would unfortunately probably have to trash it as there may be people out there wishing me harm. So please accept that your mail on its own means a lot to me.
Kind regards
Angus Stewart SC
Barrister, New Chambers
Level 34, 126 Phillip Street, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia
P +61 2 9151 2079 | F +61 2 9233 1850 | DX 187 Sydney
-
24
Why I believe in God. Why I don't believe in God.
by The Rebel inhi i am delighted to be apart of the community.. having left the witnesses one of my first challenges was my believe in god.
naturally.. i have concluded that i am alive and conscious.
now my intuition tells me god exists, but my analytical thinking tells me god does not exist.
-
-
Viviane
Accepting G-d does not mean rejecting analytical thinking. Just ask the Roman Catholic priest that developed and introduced the big bang theory, Georges Lemaître. Do you know how many atheists I’ve spoken to who have no idea that a theist developed this now widely embraced theory?
It means suspending critical thinking and rejecting it when the subject is reality. How many atheists that don't know about Lemaitre is utterly irrelevant to anything.
Actually... it's not. Lemaitre is a perfect example of rejecting god when it comes to working with reality.
-
449
Labeling one self "Atheist" is Unscientific
by LAWHFol ini have not meet all atheists, and it would be foolish for me to assume that all atheists, share the same prototypical view points.
i am inclined to feel that this classifies the views of a large percentage of atheists.
"atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.
-
-
Viviane
Voicing nothing but vindictive rhetoric against people is unscientific.
So is not knowing what you're talking about. Congratulations on being the example for class.
