If you mean now, to not risk their licenses being invalid.
Why in the world do you imagine their license would be invalid?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
If you mean now, to not risk their licenses being invalid.
Why in the world do you imagine their license would be invalid?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
No risk if they just went to another county (HINT HINT) This judge seems very impartial to me
Instead of going to another county to get the license, they went out of their way to to go through legal proceedings to get Davis punished.
As it was posted previously, all they had to do is go to another jurisdiction to get their license and this woman would not have been punished by the government. It was not the government that wanted her punished
Maybe they are afraid to impeach her (pink slip for not doing her job) because doing so would violate Davis Civil rights.
What I have read in the news articles on the net is not that government is going after Davis for not doing her job, but that gays went after her and demanded that she should be punished.
Let's deal with these erroneous non-arguments, shall we?
1) Part of her duty is to handle marriage licenses that meet the requirements of the law. She does not get to pick and choose which parts of the law she likes. There is no need to go to another county. It is 100% illegal for her to deny a same-sex couple the same license that an opposite-sex couple would get now that same sex marriage is legal. The reason that other people have no been found in contempt of court is because the court has not ordered them to do it and had them refuse. Same sex couple have the right to get a license from the clerk and she has the duty to issue them. End of story.
2) The only way she can be impeached is by the state legislature, who is not in session at the moment. Any discussion of impeachment is moot without the legislature. Being impeached for not doing her sworn duty and violating valid court order is not a violation of civil rights. Honestly, from your poor grasp of everything about this situation, I doubt you even understand what civil rights are.
3). "The gays" did not demand she be punished. She is only being punished for refusal to execute upon her sworn duty. It is her choice to be punished for violating a judges order and it is not done on the say so of "the gays" nor did they demand it.
Seriously, how wrong can you be so often?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
Fishperson, I'll sum up your entire argument for you with two easy pictures, since you like them:
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
No it does not. You have only posted a definition of the term you cut and pasted from the net.
Fishy, I posted a definition of the word. It shows you to be 100% wrong. Attempting to deny reality because "internet" means is not your friend, it simply means that every single thing you've ever posted can be called pointless and stupid because internet post also. All you've done is deny anything you've ever posted has validity and denied it in a pointless and brainless attempt to deny your own words to give yourself validity.
In other words, if you want to deny the definition, you must, by definition, call everything you've ever written useless, pointless rambling. I realize that is probably far beyond any thought you've ever had, so I won't be surprised when you don't get it. However, reality exists despite your lack of understanding, so either your words mean poop or your made an assertion that 100% contradicts observable reality.
The only question remaining is why you want to escape the consequences of your actions?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
That is not an assertion.
It 100% is, giving you a 100% failure rate on anything you say matching reality.
nounNow that reality shows you 100% made an assertion and were 100% wrong, why do you think you should be exempt from the consequences of your actions?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
When Kim Davis gets out of jail, I will personally go there and thank her.
Well, no one accused you of being smart with your time, so.... whatever.
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
Some day it may be legal for a man to marry a very young boy. It will not be considered illegal or child abuse.
What does that conjecture have to do with reality?
scotus: kentucky clerk must issue same-sex marriage licenses.
by ariane de vogue, cnn supreme court reporter.
updated 8:02 pm et, mon august 31, 2015. let's hope this is the final screech from the haters who wrap themselves in the bible - or their egoist political philosophy i doubt it will be, but let's hope..
I have not asserted.
Here is a direct quote from you asserting that she is refusing to endorse gay marriage:
She refuses to endorse ss marriages.The Bible teaches that homosexual (ss) conduct is bad and also teaches tohate what is bad.
You absolutely did make that assertion, your denial of that fact is 100% untrue. Now that we have established the facts, why do you think you should escape the consequences of your actions?