Viviane

Joined

• started 16 topics
• posted 4,484 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Viviane

• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  I would rather be on the wrong side of history, than the wrong side of God.

  How many gay men have you stoned? I only ask sobyou can be an example of following God instead of some pussy liberal that lets the government tell them what to do.

  Comeon, tough guy. Follow god or not. Kills some gays. Stone people for eating shellfish (I had shrimp last night, come at me bro).

  Show us your actually following God or show the world you don't have the stones to do it. Which are you, a shrinking daisy or follower of God?
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Whether you want to or not, you are proving the bible to be true. There will come a time when very few people will hold fast to the word of God. In the end times good will be called bad, and bad will be called good.

  And now we know that you've also no idea what the Bible says. Basically, you're passionately arguing for what you incorrectly think.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  And so are left wing liberals!

  Clearly not, since they aren't neck deep in butthurt at consistently losing.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Viviane, that is not idiotic at all, that is just what happened!

  I can't help that you passionately defend pretend made up not real history. I dunno, try reading a book on history. Or watching a movie based on an actual history book.

  We left a country where the King and the royal family had the power concentrated in their hands, and came here to America, where we the people (majority rules) could decide our destiny as a nation. Power was no longer in the hands of a few, but was placed in the hands of the many.

  As I said and you perfectly show, you've a fundamental misunderstanding of history and no idea how your government works. Your opinion is wrong and useless.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  But one mentioned routinely on the R Wing Fundie sites and by their leaders.

  Of course, because R Wingnut Fundies are stupid.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  -which goes to show it was an invalid ruling, called into question by the fact that 2 of those justice were not impartial at all, but had been involved with gay marriage personally.

  It goes to show that you've no idea how a judiciary works. You lack knowledge, education, experience or really any reason to think or suppose you've the ability to form a valid opinion.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  No, I am right.

  So far, I've not seen that ever be true. Let's see what happens next!

  Anyway, if 2 of those justices had recused themselves from the ruling, as they should have since they had performed gay marriages themselves,

  Nope. Still have exactly zero idea how your government works, why it does or what you are talking about. You're wrong in every conceivable sense of the word.

  then this ruling would have went the other way

  If germany had won, we would speak German. Alas, life is not dictated by your fantasy what if games.

  Gay people can get married. Get over it.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Our forefathers left a "minority rules" type of government to come here so the majority could rule.

  I just want to point out how mind numbigly idiotic and wrong that sentence is.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  So it basically boils down to numbers--more justices ruled for gay marriage than against.

  Congrats. You've learned how the concept known as "counting" works.

  I see this whole movement as one big cult, bent on destroying traditional values and free speech in this nation. I have seen them twist the bible in the very same way the Watchtower does, I have seen them try to silence dissent, in the very same way the Watchower does.

  Well, you're ridiculously wrong uninformed, exactly as before.
• 
  175

  Implications of gay marriage ruling

  by Rattigan350 in

  1. social
  2. current

  while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.

  but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.

  five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  The problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times. Five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.

  So your complaint is "The U.S. Constitution, legislative, executive and judicial branches worked exactly as designed, but I don't like the results"?

  Here's a pro-tip for the uninformed such as yourself: The U.S. is not a democracy. The court did exactly what is was supposed to do according to the Supreme Law of the land. You are 100% wrong and uneducated on how your government works.