Anyway in my definition Viviane " Onus Probandi" is a legal term shifting the burden of proof a person needs to proove their claim?
What do you mean by "shifting". Why wouldn't the responsibility lie with the person making the claim?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Anyway in my definition Viviane " Onus Probandi" is a legal term shifting the burden of proof a person needs to proove their claim?
What do you mean by "shifting". Why wouldn't the responsibility lie with the person making the claim?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Am I therefore to assume you are saying the burden of proof lies with the one making the claim?
I don't say it, but I recognize it to be correct in a legal and philosophic sense (onus probandi). Also, you can assume whatever you like, that's entirely up to you.
If that is the case and you were to say "God does not exist" could you prove that?
We're I to make that claim, then yes, it would be.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
So here is my challenge, how can we prove or not prove this existence of a being whose non existence is inconcivable?
Everyone who's ever existed has not proved god's existence.
Also, I can easily conceive of the non-existence of any god.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
But the fact stands that both evolved or originated from dust.
What, specifically originated from "dust"? What was this "dust" made of? Does it still exist? What's your evidence for this?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Viviane you still haven't answered bohm's reply to your challenge to name an evolving computer program.
Yes, I did. And it wasn't a challenge, it was a request for proof of EoMs claim (which bohm was also unable to answer).
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
..evidently...the question is not to name a computer program that can evolve...evidently...
Protip: Adding "evidently" to your own mistake doesn't make me look bad. You screwed up. It happens. You let your feelings for me get the best of you.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Stuff - Do you have anything to add to the topic of this thread?
I've asked that several times. Stuff won't even response. Apparently his devotion to epistimiology extends to and embraces "Run away! Run away!"
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
there doing this right under my nose but i just found out.
not sure what to do but would like your help on getting me wt information on my headship role and how they shouldn't be doing this with out my permission.
also would like some help on showing my son the ramifications on what happens to someone when they get baptized and how they'll expect him to treat me.