i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
You still haven't answered bohm.
Absolutely I did, with a rather long answer, in fact, explaining why I didn't change anything that EoM wrote and why I worded the question the way I did.
Continuing to deny that is simply dishonesty.
She ignores people who answer her with facts and plays debating tricks with words.
Nope, I answered bohm in great detail with very specific words to illustrate a point. That you don't like understand that is irrelevant to the fact.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
You should also note this thread is titled " Why do you no longer believe in God" so I assumed comments would offer evidence to that effect.
You're taking "why don't I believe in god" and trying to turn it into "I can prove god doesn't exist". Those aren't the same things.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
If you could give me a straight answer as why you say God does not exist I would appreciate it
I didn't say God does not exist.
Viviane I am an athiest, but you are the respected celebrated lawyer and expert on this board, alwaysgiving giving a funeral to those that believe in God
Your snark is noted and dismissed.
Personally I have no problem with that, if you could prove God does not exist. But you can't.
Define "god".
My conclusion is even Athiests like Viviane and the Rebel without being able to offer conclusive evidence God does not exist can be wrong.
Everyone is wrong about something sometimes. That has nothing to do with this.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Viviane let me introduce myself, I am God and I am sure you have been hearing of my charity work? and my fight against injustice and poverty? Well I happened to be in court today when your thrilling address to the jury proved this was all bullshit. But that does not prove my non existence.
Define god, calling yourself that is in no way a definition, no more than sticking feathers up your butt makes you a chicken.
Viviane can you prove My non-existence?
whose? You've given me one's existence to prove or disprove.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
But for illustration this is why I say " the responsibility does not lie with the one making the claim"
Now let's assume you just came from the election board. Viviane is now sitting on the bench and everything is absolutely legal. We have just discoverd that I voted more than once.Now this is wrong, but do my two votes count ? Unless you can disprove this matter I would suggest they do.
I don't understand why that example makes sense in relation to the question of god's existence. You'll have to connect the dots.
So can you prove God does not exist?
Define god.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Anyway in my definition Viviane " Onus Probandi" is a legal term shifting the burden of proof a person needs to proove their claim?
What do you mean by "shifting". Why wouldn't the responsibility lie with the person making the claim?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
Am I therefore to assume you are saying the burden of proof lies with the one making the claim?
I don't say it, but I recognize it to be correct in a legal and philosophic sense (onus probandi). Also, you can assume whatever you like, that's entirely up to you.
If that is the case and you were to say "God does not exist" could you prove that?
We're I to make that claim, then yes, it would be.
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
i know this question has popped up from time to time but i really would like to know how you guys, those that no longer believe, came to that conclusion?
was it the wts and all its crap?
was it something you read?
So here is my challenge, how can we prove or not prove this existence of a being whose non existence is inconcivable?
Everyone who's ever existed has not proved god's existence.
Also, I can easily conceive of the non-existence of any god.
