But who is usually more sensible and more capable of being sensible?A human beings main advantage over an animal is their intellectual capacity. That's exactly why I used the word unique.
Define "sensible". Also, are you now just saying it's not a matter of a special thing but rather a matter of degree? That's not what unique means. It's literally the opposite of what "unique" means. You could not be more wrong if you tried.
No wonder you can't communicate your ideas. You actually have no idea what the words you are using mean.
I already did that in my original post.
In fact, you claimed you could not do that. You literally claimed you could not possibly do what you are now claiming to have done. Which is it? No wonder you are so misunderstood, you don't even understand your own words.
I'm grateful of that process as everyone should but you act like the scientific method is infallible.
I never made that claim. Please stop making false claims.
The fact that it was developed over several hundred years tells of how much it has changed from the first incarnation. And it will do nothing but continue to change as humans get wiser and wiser. This seems to be the case with replicability of a scarce amount of confirmed science.
So you admit all of your claims about the scientific method were incorrect. Excellent. Now, before you proceed, please re-frame your argument using all the correct information that you now have. I ask for this so you don't pretend that having been wrong on all of your major points and arguments somehow makes those prior incorrect statements correct.
Why? Irrationality really is another manner in which we are able to survive and deal with the world.
You clearly have no idea what "irrational" means. Sadly, it seems your level of thought has stopped at https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/
For you to say I'm alive because of the scientific method shows that you view it in the same light as a believer does to God
All it does is show how little you know of science, god, faith or me. You're not 14 and this isn't deep. Develop your argument and be open to the idea of being wrong. You certainly are, but you don't have the intelligence, learning or quality thinking yet to know that.