Viviane

Joined

• started 16 topics
• posted 4,484 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Viviane

• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Viviane, it's a matter of speciality among humans

  Animals also use tools and have rituals. Your suggested it was how much that mattered, not whether or not something was special. Which is it? Is is the activity that is special or the degree to which it is done?
  

  Animals can be sensible but humans have a special type of shrewdness.

  Animals can be shrewd as well. What is special about being shrewd? I ask because your other arguments have fallen flat and proven to be non-starters when investigated and now you are trying to claim your original points while changing your underlying arguments. I'm afraid that won't do. Please explain how "shrewd" is somehow the essence of humans. Please bear in mind you've yet to explain what the "essence" is.
  

  I do understand words but I'm not the best at wording them and I hope you respect that. I'm only 18 after all and not as experienced as you all are at doing using words.

  Clearly you do not understand the words since you consistently misuse them. Since you realize your lack of education and experience, attempt to learn from others rather than beg for mercy when you make bad arguments.
  

  
  Never said you did. I said it seemed that way based on what you told me. That's why the word act was used.

  You said I was acting a certain way. I was not, so your claim was false. I realize due to your admitted lack of experience and education you probably meant something else, so here is a tip. You should have said you felt I was acting a certain way or perceived that and then asked if it was so rather than make the claim. As it stands, you said something false that you now have to walk back when you simply could have asked for clarification.
  

  I understand it but indicated that it was natural for some of us to be this way.

  That still doesn't mean in any way that how you used the word was in any way correct. It was not. Rather than pretend that being wrong twice somehow makes you right, just admit your error, learn something and move on.
  
  
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Someone who has pride and commitment to scientific faith

  That shows you have no idea how science works.
  

  The underlying thought here is that people can see evidence differently from the next person because of their unique mind. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong is subjective because it's clear that people do in fact have a distinct outlook on things no matter what they are.

  You've no idea how an objective reality works.
  
  

  The thing is that a Christian's use of creation as proof can still be proof even though it's not consolable using the scientific method as it's created by man.

  You've no idea what proof is.
  

  What I said about "the true essence of who we are as human beings" is just my opinion and you don't have to agree obviously.

  You've not actually said anything. You've written a lot of words, but said actually nothing.
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  In that way they are similar because they can lead humans to their path whether right or wrong. Here's why they are just as similar. Someone who believes in God and feels that there is evidence in creation believes that it is "evidence" based on how they see it.

  All you've told us is that, much like the person that says the Bible is evidence for god, you have absolutely no idea what "evidence" means and you have no business being taken seriously.

  See this thread, it will do you a world of good. https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/420420001/quality-thinking-warning-long-post-ahead
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  But who is usually more sensible and more capable of being sensible?A human beings main advantage over an animal is their intellectual capacity. That's exactly why I used the word unique.

  Define "sensible". Also, are you now just saying it's not a matter of a special thing but rather a matter of degree? That's not what unique means. It's literally the opposite of what "unique" means. You could not be more wrong if you tried.

  No wonder you can't communicate your ideas. You actually have no idea what the words you are using mean.

  I already did that in my original post.

  In fact, you claimed you could not do that. You literally claimed you could not possibly do what you are now claiming to have done. Which is it? No wonder you are so misunderstood, you don't even understand your own words.
  

  I'm grateful of that process as everyone should but you act like the scientific method is infallible.

  I never made that claim. Please stop making false claims.

  The fact that it was developed over several hundred years tells of how much it has changed from the first incarnation. And it will do nothing but continue to change as humans get wiser and wiser. This seems to be the case with replicability of a scarce amount of confirmed science.

  So you admit all of your claims about the scientific method were incorrect. Excellent. Now, before you proceed, please re-frame your argument using all the correct information that you now have. I ask for this so you don't pretend that having been wrong on all of your major points and arguments somehow makes those prior incorrect statements correct.

  Why? Irrationality really is another manner in which we are able to survive and deal with the world.

  You clearly have no idea what "irrational" means. Sadly, it seems your level of thought has stopped at https://www.reddit.com/r/im14andthisisdeep/

  For you to say I'm alive because of the scientific method shows that you view it in the same light as a believer does to God

  All it does is show how little you know of science, god, faith or me. You're not 14 and this isn't deep. Develop your argument and be open to the idea of being wrong. You certainly are, but you don't have the intelligence, learning or quality thinking yet to know that.

  
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  OrphanCrow, the scientific method's process was created by someone's unique technique which was based on him and the way he saw things. That way works for most people but not for everyone.

  The scientific method was developed of thousands of years across many cultures as a way to investigate reality without allowing human bias to influence the investigations. The very fact that you are alive and using a computer to post your comments instead of using spirit to do so is proof of that.
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  That what you call "irrationality" is just another way individuals are able to be practical and problem solvers.

  You literally could not be more wrong if you tried. There is no level of wrongness more than what you achieved with that sentence. It's approach the level of "not even wrong".
  
  
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Here's where the real difficult part comes. It's really tough to explain what I really mean in just a few words without someone confusing it.

  It's not difficult at all. Summarize your point, then write as much or as little as you need to support your point(s). Use logic, critical thinking, evidence and reasoning to explain the connections and form your argument.
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  The true essence of who we are is our unique ability to be sensible and solve problems. Two people who have carbon copy beliefs can see things in a completely different way. But, if their beliefs lead to virtue, goodness, and peace then I find that astonishing since we as human beings have struggled with this since beginning times. I'm just putting in to context how that specific ability of ours is like a God in that it can help us to become the best person we can

  There are animals that use tools and solve problems. Animals certainly can be sensible. So far you've not told me what the essence of who we are is. What if a person can't solve problems and is insensible? Do they have no essence? Your comments on beliefs and essence have nothing tying them together.
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  What is the essence of who we are as a person? You've just replaced one undefined term with another. What is an inner spirit of value? Christians have different values from each other. What do these terms mean?
• 
  251

  God is Real in Principle

  by looter in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  now the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.

  now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.

  our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Viviane

  Rebelfighter, even Christians can't agree on what they mean. Why should any of the rest of us bother when they can't get it together?