Looter, you just keep replacing one unexplained phrase with another. If you can't handle questions about what you write, please don't attempt to blame others for that.
Viviane
JoinedPosts by Viviane
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
How many times must I repeat myself with you?
So far, you've not repeated yourself. You've said essence, shrewdness, nature, etc. You just keep replacing one term with another, never repeating or explaining.
I've explained it best way possible and you'll keep asking questions no matter what.
Well year, dear. That's what happens when you can't explain what you mean and aren't clear.
I'm letting it go because it'll never lead to anything at least with you.
No, not likely, because I don't accept "nonsense" as an explanation.
To you. I don't put it that way. Yet another case of us seeing things differently. It's always that. Can you not see this?
I absolutely see your complaint. You made it, you feel it. You simply seek to blame someone else for it rather than realize it's your own lack of an argument that is the cause of your current feelings.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
You say that I'm uneducated yet you continue to ask me questions to further keep telling me the same thing. I've already explained it the best I could. Please let it go.
Sorry, not how it works. If you intend on claiming to have a point and an argument to back it up, then you will keep getting questions. That you keep changing one undefined and unexplainable phrase with another is purely the fault of the person putting forth the argument. If you wish to get no more questions about it, then you need to stop trying to defend it OR actually put forth a defensible argument where you can clearly explain what you mean.
If you want it let go, then let it go. Why are you asking me to do your work?
Like I said before, it's my opinion.
Opinions can be objectively wrong or nonsensical.
It wasn't a complaint so much as it was a reason. If there is anything I am learning here, is that some people have no empathy.
It was absolutely a complaint. What do you think empathy is? I assure you, if you keep up this claim of being intelligent, you'll look back on this conversation and how absolutely polite it was. I've just asked you question about what you wrote. If you can't answer them, what in the world do you think that your failure has to do with "empathy"?
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
But I'd think you can share ideas without the need to be sparkling in it either.
So your complaint is that the free gift of learning offered you didn't come in a pretty enough package?
Boo. F-ing. Hoo.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
Animals can indeed be shrewd but that's why the word special was used. We have a superior nature to that than of animals
So now it's "superior nature"? Again, in what sense? You keep replacing one thing you can't explain with another. You've said nothing again. What is a "superior nature"?
Thanks for the advice but this whole thing is a learning process to me.
Then learn. The idea of learning is anathema to your statement of ...
We disagree here. Fine, end of story.
You've literally said dozens of factually incorrect things. Rather than learning, you choose to walk way. How is that in keeping with your claims of wanting to learn?
Whether or not I would have said that or not, I strongly believe you would have said the exact same thing. But that's just my opinion.
There literally would have been no reason for me to refute your claim had you not made it. You're being nonsensical to claim otherwise.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
Look I apologize for that as that was uncalled for but I'd like to think I'm intelligent.
You may well be, but "intelligent" and "educated" are two different things. Life experience is another matter altogether. You can choose to get in a huff or choose to better yourself with education and experience. How you handle those things will largely determine the outcome of your life.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
Look, Viviane, you are coming pretty strongly towards me and it's unnecessary as we generally just disagree with each other. And It's coming to a point where it's not discussable anymore but rather just a bunch of short assertions which are not my cup of tee.
I'm being rather gentle towards you. Perhaps due to your admitted youth and inexperience you aren't used to the frankness with which adult conversations take place.
If you can't use words properly, form an argument or stay on topic, perhaps discussion of a rational nature isn't your cup of tea.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
Viviane, it's a matter of speciality among humans
Animals also use tools and have rituals. Your suggested it was how much that mattered, not whether or not something was special. Which is it? Is is the activity that is special or the degree to which it is done?
Animals can be sensible but humans have a special type of shrewdness.
Animals can be shrewd as well. What is special about being shrewd? I ask because your other arguments have fallen flat and proven to be non-starters when investigated and now you are trying to claim your original points while changing your underlying arguments. I'm afraid that won't do. Please explain how "shrewd" is somehow the essence of humans. Please bear in mind you've yet to explain what the "essence" is.
I do understand words but I'm not the best at wording them and I hope you respect that. I'm only 18 after all and not as experienced as you all are at doing using words.
Clearly you do not understand the words since you consistently misuse them. Since you realize your lack of education and experience, attempt to learn from others rather than beg for mercy when you make bad arguments.
Never said you did. I said it seemed that way based on what you told me. That's why the word act was used.You said I was acting a certain way. I was not, so your claim was false. I realize due to your admitted lack of experience and education you probably meant something else, so here is a tip. You should have said you felt I was acting a certain way or perceived that and then asked if it was so rather than make the claim. As it stands, you said something false that you now have to walk back when you simply could have asked for clarification.
I understand it but indicated that it was natural for some of us to be this way.
That still doesn't mean in any way that how you used the word was in any way correct. It was not. Rather than pretend that being wrong twice somehow makes you right, just admit your error, learn something and move on.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
Someone who has pride and commitment to scientific faith
That shows you have no idea how science works.
The underlying thought here is that people can see evidence differently from the next person because of their unique mind. Regardless of whether it is right or wrong is subjective because it's clear that people do in fact have a distinct outlook on things no matter what they are.
You've no idea how an objective reality works.
The thing is that a Christian's use of creation as proof can still be proof even though it's not consolable using the scientific method as it's created by man.
You've no idea what proof is.
What I said about "the true essence of who we are as human beings" is just my opinion and you don't have to agree obviously.
You've not actually said anything. You've written a lot of words, but said actually nothing.
-
251
God is Real in Principle
by looter innow the majority of people nowadays do no go by the hope of old times.
now the reason for this is important and goes beyond mere words.
our culture sees ethics especially national or civil politics as the rules and standards by which we guide ourselves.
-
Viviane
In that way they are similar because they can lead humans to their path whether right or wrong. Here's why they are just as similar. Someone who believes in God and feels that there is evidence in creation believes that it is "evidence" based on how they see it.
All you've told us is that, much like the person that says the Bible is evidence for god, you have absolutely no idea what "evidence" means and you have no business being taken seriously.
See this thread, it will do you a world of good. https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/420420001/quality-thinking-warning-long-post-ahead