your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
@Viviane it's all about eliminating the possibilities. Ruling things out is a critical action of science. Where did u study?
Wrong again. Viv's Law still holds true.
hadriel viv is a jack (sorry jackess) of all trades - she has studied a little of this that and the other. she is here to rally her side when they are threatened with defeat
I am not at all surprised that you resort to calling names.It's literally all you have.
hello brothers and sisters and truth seekers,.
i am an active jehovah's witness.
i don't believe in 1914 and i'm tototally against their way of dealing with abuse cases.
Altogether ignoring the millions of peoples' lives that have been saved through a blood transfusion.
Very true. Using Andromeda's reasoning, it is safe to conclude that all Christians are dangerous pedophiles because some are.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
A good scientist will consider all possibilities not just the ones convenient for him.
Not true. You're a perfect example of Viv's Law.
Outside of item one which is simply my opinion, if you disagree with either 2 or 3 you're not being honest and only considering possibilities which fit your narrative.
Viv's law in action. You really need to start with this thread...https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/420420001/quality-thinking-warning-long-post-ahead
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Why should we suppose our view of reality is more truthful than a dolphin for example?
Is that supposed to be a meaningful question? I assure you it isn't.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Hadriel in science they don't like to attribute changes to unique events and tend to keep on pursuing explanations that are more systematic. so here you will meet a lot of resistance.
A perfect example of Viv's Law.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
Viv's law of nothingness. Seriously Viv believing that one is a great physicist is a common effect of Schizophrenia or at least delusions of grandeur
What ridiculous BS are trying to sell? If you've a claim to make, sack up and say it, don't dance around it.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
I can't see any subterfuge in my post, I thought I was just plainly calling you out for claiming something that you cant possibly know. I can't recall having crossed paths before, were you talking nonsense on another thread?
Some people here suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
I agree viv. and indeed as you can probably see I am not using quantum physics to invoke a higher power but to understand why another power/s may be invoked.
Proof of Viv's Law.
The processes here are similar (but not the same of course) to the electrochemical processes in physics - the interactions of quarks that is. please stop misleading
And more proof.
Actually, I am updating Viv's Law to state "anytime someone uses science in an effort to prove an incorporeal spirit creature, i.e., higher power, exists, did exist or took or takes action in the physical, material universe, you can be 100% certain that person doesn't know what any of those things means and lacks critical thinking skills".
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
your qualifications are way above mine so i'd love to hear more about the specifics of what you have researched and how that supports the existence of a deity.
k99, i am not really convinced that you're interested in my conclusions.
in nature amino acids formed to then form dna.
It's not an picture of a cloud in which you say there is an image of a sleeping black baby, is it?
Wasn't it in the hand, the sleeping black baby?
