Most planetary mass rotates at 10 hours, not 24
Mercury is about 59 days, Venus is 243 days, Mars is 23, Jupiter is almost 10, Saturn is 10, Uranus is 16, Neptune is 16, Pluto is 6 days. So no, most don't rotate at 10 hours.
just thought id let you all in on some info i found on northeasttruth.com.
that magical moment where the moon blocks out the sun!
but only just enough to perfectly cover the suns disc, whilst still allowing us to see the corona of light and other electromagnetic forces radiating from it.. this only happens because the moon diameter is exactly 1/400th the size of the suns and is positioned at exactly 1/400th of the distance between earth and the sun!so, when we see it from the surface of earth, we are in the only place this can ever be seen, at the only time it could ever happen.
Most planetary mass rotates at 10 hours, not 24
Mercury is about 59 days, Venus is 243 days, Mars is 23, Jupiter is almost 10, Saturn is 10, Uranus is 16, Neptune is 16, Pluto is 6 days. So no, most don't rotate at 10 hours.
okay cut to the chase.
the united states has got a problem.
hillary clinton is so unpopular that practically any republican who ran against her would probably have beaten her.
First, the United States is NOT a democracy, it is a representative republic.
Second, American politics is pretty cyclical. Ever four to five decades, things polarize, shift, break, a new normal appears and the cycle restarts. For reference, see the Whig, Tory and Bull Moose parties, Barry Goldwater, Donald Trump, the Democratic Convention of 1860.
okay cut to the chase.
the united states has got a problem.
hillary clinton is so unpopular that practically any republican who ran against her would probably have beaten her.
A vote for clinton is a vote for turning this country into a communist/socialist country.
Well, now I know you don't know what either of those words means.
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
You can not have anything happening without having time to do it in.
Why not? Be specific.
PS: all these writers, Krauss, Penrose, Carroll imply that there was time and energy in the "void" preceding the big bang, a void,
Define void, please. And be specific. Also, citation required.
*Edit* Nevermind, I see cofty beat me to it. At least prologos freely admits he doesn't understand what he is reading and just cherry picking to support the word salad he calls a world view. However, when you try to get him to explain it, it turns into asking a theist what spirit is made of.
all us creationists try to do is offer true evidence that the one and only god is out there watching and looking down on us.
we present that certain scientists know the truth about god and that he is everything that we see from trees, life, weather, the air we breath, and even the most simple molecules.
but of course you atheists reject it because it is your nature to not be humble and see god because you want to rule your own life.
For the non-theists here that demand you assimilate because you said so....yeah you can "fuck off
Not one person has demanded that of you. That sort of dishonesty is why you earned the "fuck off". It wasn't given to you freely, you earned your fuck off the old fashioned way, by being a lying jackass with short man's disease.
all us creationists try to do is offer true evidence that the one and only god is out there watching and looking down on us.
we present that certain scientists know the truth about god and that he is everything that we see from trees, life, weather, the air we breath, and even the most simple molecules.
but of course you atheists reject it because it is your nature to not be humble and see god because you want to rule your own life.
Zappa-esqe.... Perhaps you heard it at a "how to be a dishonest theist troll" seminar, because you certainly didn't see any such nonsense here.
anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
Wow, looks like an alliance between the trolls, the dishonest theists, the intellectually lazy and shit slingers is strong today.
Oh, and Hadriel, since you asked used to say you don't know.... You don't know.
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
I didn't call you anything, HEL. I just gave you the opportunity to prove you and boy did you ever hit a grandslam doing it, too.
You didn't get called anything, you happily showed us, troll.
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
Hateful? What an odd thing to say. Looks like the answer is D, all of the above.
I don't hate you, I truly don't. That implies I care enough to have formed an emotion about you. You're not risen to that level yet. Soz, not soz.
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
I am dumb. I've never seen, talked to or read a description of this god of yours.
What is it? Can you answer? If not, why not? Ignorance? Fear? Just too chickenshit? Which is it?