it is a pain that certain individuals pride themselves on hating god, who created everything.
like it's understandable that you choose to not believe in him because of your selfishness or thinking skills but to hate him is forcing it a bit.
i'm very thankful that those such as myself have the courage to believe in the lord.
Like it's understandable that you choose to not believe in him because of your selfishness or thinking skills but to hate him is forcing it a bit.
Choose not to believe? That's like saying I choose not to believe in unicorns orbiting the moon. There's just no evidence for it. This why, when people like you use the words "thinking skills", it's a perfect example of Viv's Law.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Shunning? That's what witnesses do and I'm strictly against that nonsense. Everything else you mentioned is just a generalization.
This is a typical theist position of wanting to claim the good stuff and say "oh, all that bad stuff I reject" even though it's part and parcel of their belief system. They do it with themselves because they do it with their god, try to claim it awesome and pretend the really really horrible stuff can be waved away.
It's a joke. It's both morally and intellectually dishonest.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
So now Vidquin is trying to blame me for getting caught pretending to be a microbiologist and for not reading things he googled that say something other than what he claimed?
Wow, that's pretty funny!
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Wait. Wait Wait Wait. So microfauxologist Vid posts a link to an article about docs prescribing anti-biotics for what they think is an infection but is really the flu, and somehow thinks this means doctors are prescribing them FOR the flu?
This Is hilarious.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
So the microfauxologist is now trying to pretend and article on the internet that doesn't say what he thought it said proves him right?
This just keeps getting better and better.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Wait, did I just read that faux microbiologist vidquin claimed doctors are prescribing antibiotics for the flu?
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Vidquin attempts to insult me and pretend to be a microbiologist are a delight. Good job, guys.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Maybe I am, but if I were a microbiologist and someone said "eagle", I would use my training to talk about which micro-organisms were specific to eagles, specific species of eagles, what we know about them, how we know it, what micro-organisms cab make eaglrs sick or healthy, etc..
Instead, you got caught, and, according to you, by an idiot. Oopsie!
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Ah, so your plan is to say the name of common micro-organisms and go to bed? Anyway, I pick eagle. As a microbiologist you should have been more specific if you meant something other than organism. That's just more evidence that leads me to believe you were never a microbiologist.
So, eagle it is. Go.
Oh, and you can google in 30 seconds how to identify all of those in a lab. So what? You're still ignorant of the science itself.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
None, Vidquin. Why do you think that would even be relevant to discuss if you had actually been a microbiologist? I mean, were I to say a bald eagle, how would that apply to microbiology in a way that would allow you to prove what you otherwise havrn't been able to?
