we like to think we are logical and have good reasons for for our beliefs.
no more so than when it comes to our reasons for rejecting the truth claims of jws.
we reject their version of history, such as the date of the fall of jerusalem, because it doesn't agree with the historical evidence.
Logical arguments only work with people are are already convinced. Amd persuasion only works with people who want to be persuaded.
Huh?
Logical arguments work on people who understand logic (good logic) and are willing to use it. Persuasion works on people who are willing to be persuaded by whatever they deem as important.
if you were a computer programmer and you were to create a simulated automated world, that would constantly evolve and self run after initial designs.
first you would have to code the rules, laws, and core elements of this world.
while this is being coded, the program is not run yet, so none of it exists.
I don't know how accurate that is, but again it makes you wonder about the usefulness of the distinction between reality and simulation.
It's accurate in the same sense that a nuclear blast is a chance to re-landscape the garden and about as useful. It's a perfect example of Viv's Law. He is simply using a poor understanding of quantum state superpostion and wave function collapse to arrive at this idea of reality being "filled in". Many an armchair phsysicists attempting deep thoughts on reality have fallen into this trap.
if you were a computer programmer and you were to create a simulated automated world, that would constantly evolve and self run after initial designs.
first you would have to code the rules, laws, and core elements of this world.
while this is being coded, the program is not run yet, so none of it exists.
Seems like someone doesn't know how proof or logic works. Or programming, compiling, beta and alpha testing, etc.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
I don't think people understand the logic of saying "can't happen".
it is a pain that certain individuals pride themselves on hating god, who created everything.
like it's understandable that you choose to not believe in him because of your selfishness or thinking skills but to hate him is forcing it a bit.
i'm very thankful that those such as myself have the courage to believe in the lord.
Like it's understandable that you choose to not believe in him because of your selfishness or thinking skills but to hate him is forcing it a bit.
Choose not to believe? That's like saying I choose not to believe in unicorns orbiting the moon. There's just no evidence for it. This why, when people like you use the words "thinking skills", it's a perfect example of Viv's Law.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Shunning? That's what witnesses do and I'm strictly against that nonsense. Everything else you mentioned is just a generalization.
This is a typical theist position of wanting to claim the good stuff and say "oh, all that bad stuff I reject" even though it's part and parcel of their belief system. They do it with themselves because they do it with their god, try to claim it awesome and pretend the really really horrible stuff can be waved away.
It's a joke. It's both morally and intellectually dishonest.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
So now Vidquin is trying to blame me for getting caught pretending to be a microbiologist and for not reading things he googled that say something other than what he claimed?
Wow, that's pretty funny!
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Wait. Wait Wait Wait. So microfauxologist Vid posts a link to an article about docs prescribing anti-biotics for what they think is an infection but is really the flu, and somehow thinks this means doctors are prescribing them FOR the flu?
This Is hilarious.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
So the microfauxologist is now trying to pretend and article on the internet that doesn't say what he thought it said proves him right?
This just keeps getting better and better.
arguing with those who reject scientific evidence can be like arguing about football; just as angry and passionate, but the goalposts keep moving, and one team doesn't exist.. read more here....
Wait, did I just read that faux microbiologist vidquin claimed doctors are prescribing antibiotics for the flu?
